I had an Idea that wasn't as impressive as I thought it was, Comments?

  • Context: Other 
  • Thread starter Thread starter phoenix95
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Idea
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the experience of generating ideas in research and invention, particularly the feelings of disappointment when an idea does not meet expectations. Participants share personal anecdotes and reflections on the creative process, including how to handle failures and the commonality of such experiences in the research community.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Meta-discussion

Main Points Raised

  • One participant reflects on a personal experience of having an idea that seemed promising but ultimately felt unimpressive, questioning whether this is a common occurrence among experienced researchers.
  • Another participant asserts that in research, it is typical to have many ideas that do not pan out, suggesting that this is part of the creative process.
  • A different contributor emphasizes the importance of exploring multiple ideas and learning from those that do not succeed, sharing a personal success story that came after many rejected ideas.
  • One participant notes that while many ideas may fail, the few that succeed can be very rewarding, highlighting the value of persistence in creativity.
  • Another participant advises that successful inventors often try to critically evaluate their ideas against practical considerations, such as feasibility and existing knowledge, before pursuing them further.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that experiencing failures in idea generation is common and part of the creative process. However, there is no consensus on specific strategies for handling these failures, as different participants share varying approaches and perspectives.

Contextual Notes

Some participants mention the importance of critical evaluation and learning from past ideas, but the discussion does not resolve how best to approach this process or the specific criteria for evaluating ideas.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for researchers, inventors, and students in STEM fields who are navigating the challenges of idea generation and dealing with the disappointment of unfruitful concepts.

phoenix95
Gold Member
Messages
81
Reaction score
23
While doing homework about a week ago, I had an idea to solve a problem that was arguably better than the conventional method. It involved a slightly different look at math objects, resulting in a much simpler calculation. As far as I know, I haven't seen any textbook or paper that uses this method. I was playing with these objects and went on a goose chase. I thought I had "some implications that change the way we see the world" :doh: . But it obviously wasn't.

This is probably my first experience of having a not so impressive idea. But I want to ask you veterans out there. Is this common? Did this ever happen to you? How to respond when an idea fails?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman
Physics news on Phys.org
Generally in research, you will have many many many ideas that do not pan out.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: phoenix95 and berkeman
phoenix95 said:
This is probably my first experience of having a not so impressive idea. But I want to ask you veterans out there. Is this common? Did this ever happen to you? How to respond when an idea fails?
You did the right things. You were keeping creative thoughts in mind even when doing your daily work, and you were able to quickly eliminate the incorrect idea before it became a big distraction :smile: or an obsession.

When working on each of my patents, I've literally had more than a dozen ideas for each that I explored, and some took longer to eliminate than the others. The good thing is to learn from each false start what the basic problem was, so that you can avoid that issue when you have your next idea on the problem. Eventually, you get to the aha! moment, when all of your previous objections are eliminated, and you have a viable solution/patent/paper. One of my best patent ideas came to me in a Jacuzzi early in a morning after a swimming workout, but only because I'd been working on it for months and had rejected a dozen other ideas as incorrect. That patent made good money for my employer at the time. :smile:

Hang in there and stay creative!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jrmichler and phoenix95
I'm definitely no veteran, but I like to try a lot of things; a lot of times it doesn't work out although the scarce few times it does work are golden.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: phoenix95
Many people can come up with a new idea. Successful inventors and researchers quickly learn that the very first thing to do is to try to shoot it down. Check against the laws of physics, do a patent and prior art search, triple check against the requirements, estimate cost, establish that it can be manufactured, etc. The majority of new ideas get shot down before getting very far. Certainly, most of my ideas were shot down. By me, sometimes by others.

You have shown that you are a creative thinker. Keep it up. Sooner or later, one of your ideas will succeed.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: phoenix95 and berkeman

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
6K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
5K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
8K