I have 2 questions about relativity

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter hrishikesh
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Relativity
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around questions related to the Theory of Relativity, specifically focusing on the nature of velocity in relation to light and photons, as well as the implications of space warping in gravitational fields. Participants explore both theoretical and conceptual aspects of these topics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that the speed of light, denoted as c, is a universal constant relative to all inertial observers.
  • Others question the nature of velocity when considering two photons moving in opposite directions, noting that photons lack a rest frame and suggesting that their relative speed cannot be defined in conventional terms.
  • One participant mentions that the relativistic velocity addition formula leads to an indeterminate form when applied to photons, indicating a unique aspect of their behavior in relativity.
  • Questions arise regarding whether the constant speed c applies solely to light or to the entire electromagnetic spectrum, with some asserting it applies to both.
  • Participants discuss the concept of space warping, with some clarifying that this notion is often vague and context-dependent, particularly distinguishing between Special and General Relativity.
  • There is mention of how observers in gravitational fields perceive curvature, with a focus on the effects of tidal forces and the conditions under which they are noticed.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the nature of velocity in relation to photons and the implications of space warping. There is no consensus on the interpretation of these concepts, and multiple competing views remain present throughout the discussion.

Contextual Notes

Some statements rely on specific definitions and assumptions about inertial frames and the nature of light, which may not be universally agreed upon. The discussion also touches on complex mathematical formulations that are not fully resolved.

hrishikesh
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
First of all, velocity is a relative phenomenon. When we say velocity of an object is s m/s, it is relative to some other object or a frame of reference (fixed to an object).

1)According to the Theory of relativity, the speed of light is always equal to 3*10^8 m/s. But this velocity is considered relative to what?

2) When two photons are moving in opposite directions, what is the velocity of one photon with respect to the other?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1) c is an universal constant. That's the basic ingredient of special relativity ! So, c is constant with respect to "EVERYTHING" !

2) The photon speed is always c. One cannot exceed this speed, which is another consequence of the basic theorem of special relativity. Just try this for instance : Use the Lorentz transformations to calculate how fast one observer is moving with respect to 2 others. Of these 2 other observers, one is not moving and the other has some speed v. So the third one is moving with some speed v' with respect to the second one, which is moving with speed v compared to the third one.

In classical physics, you will find out that one can just add up the velocities linearly. In special relativity this will not work : so speed does not add up linearly ! This is one of the biggest differences between Newton and special relativity.

Enjoy...

marlon
 
hrishikesh said:
2) When two photons are moving in opposite directions, what is the velocity of one photon with respect to the other?
Photons don't have their own rest frame, so all we can say is that in any inertial reference frame the speed of each photon will be c. Since their direction is opposite then the distance between the two photons will be increasing at 2c. Note that this is not the same as saying what is their velocity wrt each other.
 
I'm going to jump in here with a question too.

Is only light at the constant c or the whole electromagnetic spectrum?
and if space is warped, is it warped in the frame too or does it remain the same?
 
hrishikesh said:
First of all, velocity is a relative phenomenon. When we say velocity of an object is s m/s, it is relative to some other object or a frame of reference (fixed to an object).

1)According to the Theory of relativity, the speed of light is always equal to 3*10^8 m/s. But this velocity is considered relative to what?

2) When two photons are moving in opposite directions, what is the velocity of one photon with respect to the other?

1) Relative to any inertial observer.

2) The relatavistic velocity addition formula give the the answer as 0/0. In other words indeterminate. This is not a contradiction to (1) because no physical observer can move at c relative to any other observer.
 
maxwilli06 said:
I'm going to jump in here with a question too.

Is only light at the constant c or the whole electromagnetic spectrum?
and if space is warped, is it warped in the frame too or does it remain the same?

Yes, the constant speed c applies to the whole electromagnetic spectrum.

As far as space warping is concerned the term is vague and often used in hand waving arguments. It is better to be more specific by what you mean by warping. If you mean the curvature of space due to gravity then we are talking about General Relativity and not Special Relativity. An observer that is stationary in a gravitational field would notice the curvature unless they are restricted to a infinitessimally small volume. Technically the frame of that observer is not an inertail frame as they are experiencing acceleration. You would have to clear if you are talking about an observer that is free falling or stationary in the gravitational field.
 
kev said:
An observer that is stationary in a gravitational field would notice the curvature unless they are restricted to a infinitessimally small volume.

With the exception of an uniform gravitational field, wouldn't tidal forces still be detected?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 57 ·
2
Replies
57
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 52 ·
2
Replies
52
Views
4K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K