I have a general question, totally clueless

  • Thread starter Thread starter uperkurk
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    General
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the complexity of physics and the notation used within the field. It highlights the challenges faced by those unfamiliar with physics, particularly regarding the understanding of equations and symbols. The conversation emphasizes that much of physics notation serves as shorthand for complex calculations, with linear algebra and calculus being foundational components. It notes that understanding these symbols requires familiarity with underlying physical concepts such as momentum and wavefunctions. The evolution of physics knowledge is described as cumulative, building on previous discoveries and experiences, akin to a pyramid or a pile of sand. This foundational knowledge enables students to learn basic physics and eventually contribute to scientific advancements.
uperkurk
Messages
167
Reaction score
0
I just cut this from a university PDF file I found and just looking through. I understand absolutely nothing what is being said and I don't study physics in anyway. I can't even do algebra haha but I have a queston. Who invents this stuff? How can anyone remember all that stuff? How is it possible for someone to sit and think, then come up with such an equation or formula?

More to the point, how many different types of symbols are there in physics lol. Just inventing more and more by the looks of it.
 

Attachments

  • Untitled.jpg
    Untitled.jpg
    21.3 KB · Views: 489
Physics news on Phys.org
Some of the notation is just shorthand for calculations that are simple but tiresome when written out in full, e.g. multiplying and adding rows and columns of numbers in a certain order. Lots of "linear algebra" falls into that category. Then one step up from that would be calculus, which you can understand geometrically in terms of slopes and areas, but where the experience you need to read the symbols is more complicated than for algebra. Finally, you have the physical concepts that you need to read equations like those, like momentum, wavefunctions, groups of fields, because that's what the equations are ultimately talking about.

Experience also teaches you what's essential and what's inessential. For example, the central relation here is that an operator "C" applied to a two-part object (psi, psibar) gives the sum of two other two-part objects. The "i"s and "1/p"s are just numbers, details. It's just like how, if you were reading a sentence, you would know that the noun is the subject, and the adjectives modify the noun.
 
also, people don't just sit around and think up equations. All of our current knowledge is based off of what we already knew. It's like a big pyramid. Or maybe more like a big pile of sand that is getting more sand piled on to it. Something like that.

Long time ago, we started with the basics. Eventually, after lots of experiments and stuff, we've reached our current level. It's all built off of the stuff before it.

It's why kids can go to school, learn basic physics, and then eventually go on to make discoveries of their own when they become scientists.
 
https://www.newsweek.com/robert-redford-dead-hollywood-live-updates-2130559 Apparently Redford was a somewhat poor student, so was headed to Europe to study art and painting, but stopped in New York and studied acting. Notable movies include Barefoot in the Park (1967 with Jane Fonda), Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid (1969, with Paul Newma), Jeremiah Johnson, the political drama The Candidate (both 1972), The Sting (1973 with Paul Newman), the romantic dramas The Way We Were (1973), and...
Back
Top