I have empiracle evidence for life after death.

  • Thread starter b11ngoo
  • Start date
Originally posted by treat2
Christian creationists put the Earth's age and the age of the Universe between 6-10,000 years old, with 6,000 being the most popularly stated number.

The stars in the Universe (except for our Sun) are MILLIONS AND BILLIONS of LIGHT YEARS away from us. How we can possibly be able to either see or

just scientifically detect ANY stars?

Please explain how this obvious contradition is scientifically possible with reference to any empirical evidence.
- I postulate. The intersection/geometry must have .5 in it's empiracle evidence. Or 1/2. It follows action is followed by reaction.

Now since we want empiracle evidence. There it is.

1)
Now I apply Christ to this rule. Not God. Christ.

How many people are you ? 1. Christ says treat everybody like you. Like # 1.

Christ said his father verified him. His father is .5 and Christ is .5 So both are the same.

2)
Newton's third law has .5 in a form of it's empiracle evidence.

So Christ followed Newton's third law.
Since .5 is in empiracle evidence.

3)
- The intersection/geometry the Government had was action, and Christ's was reaction. Reason. Given.
- It follows that .5 = Action = Government = God the father. Reason. Christ's confession.
- So when the Government folds Christ. He still confesses God. Reason. Christs confession.
- There is a complementary and corresponding intersection/geometry in life. Reason.We all live and die. We all are healthy or unhealthy.
The complementary reaction of the living is we all laugh at unhealthy or healthy things. There's variety.
- Jesus experienced the negative complementary acute angle. Death. Reason. Given.
- Now the death is equal with life. Reason. Complementary acute angles are equal.
- So he just needed the right action and he would be positive or living again. Reason. Aliens. Cosmic aliens might know how to make acute angles equal under any

circumstance or state. The negative experience would be made positive again. "Dead man walks after sleeping for 3 Jewish days."Now that's news worthy.
 
Once more, a postulate is not empirical evidence.

Please, please, PLEASE, make it a priority to find out what the word empirical means before the next time you use it again.
 
Originally posted by b11ngoo
- I postulate. The intersection/geometry must have .5 in it's empiracle evidence. Or 1/2. It follows action is followed by reaction.

Now since we want empiracle evidence. There it is.
???
 

Janitor

Science Advisor
1,096
1
Well now

Jesus sits at the right hand of the Father, so Jesus is east and the Father is north. And the Holy Ghost "descended like a dove" so the Holy Ghost is up. That's the three good, moral dimensions. But time, see, it comes "like a thief in the night." So time is Satan, and that's the fourth dimension.

It's all encoded in the diagonal elements of the metric tensor:

+ + + -

If you see an author using

- - - +

you know right off the bat that he is a Satanist.
 
Originally posted by b11ngoo
I postulate. The intersection/geometry must have .5 in it's empiracle evidence. Or 1/2. It follows action is followed by reaction.
I like your posts. They're .... silly ...
 
I posted a full statement. My statement was misunderstood. I understand the statement percieved to be different from what I posted.
 

Physics Forums Values

We Value Quality
• Topics based on mainstream science
• Proper English grammar and spelling
We Value Civility
• Positive and compassionate attitudes
• Patience while debating
We Value Productivity
• Disciplined to remain on-topic
• Recognition of own weaknesses
• Solo and co-op problem solving

Hot Threads

Top