Is there a way to represent Grassmann Numbers from previously known mathematical entities? Something like when it is said, for "C", that z=x+i*y and i^2=-1 or that z = [a -b; b a] with the usual rules of matrix sum and multiplication?(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

It is pretty strange to me that it is so hard to find books or pdfs on line about it. has someone ever demonstrated that these entities even exist? Is fermionic math supported over nothing????

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# I have never seen a Grassmann Number

Loading...

Similar Threads for never Grassmann Number | Date |
---|---|

B Never-ending experiments in MWI | Aug 13, 2017 |

I Bell test where observers never were in a common light cone | Apr 9, 2017 |

I Eigenvalues of Fermionic field operator | Feb 22, 2017 |

I QM has never made a prediction contradicted by experiment | Sep 16, 2016 |

Why we never see a rational charge? | Nov 1, 2015 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**