I have something that doesn't work out for me

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter jacobrhcp
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Work
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the application of the Mean Value Theorem in differential analysis, specifically regarding a function f that is twice differentiable with f(0)=f'(0)=0 and f''(x)≥1 for all x>0. The user attempts to demonstrate that f'(x)≥x and subsequently f(x)≥x², but encounters a contradiction when considering the function 1/2 x², which meets the initial conditions yet does not satisfy f(x)≥x². The error identified in the discussion is the misinterpretation of the implications of f'(x)≥x, which does not guarantee that f'(c)≥x for all c.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Mean Value Theorem in calculus
  • Knowledge of differentiable functions and their properties
  • Familiarity with second derivatives and their implications
  • Basic algebraic manipulation of inequalities
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the Mean Value Theorem and its applications in calculus
  • Study the implications of second derivatives on function behavior
  • Explore examples of functions that satisfy specific derivative conditions
  • Analyze common pitfalls in applying calculus theorems to inequalities
USEFUL FOR

Students studying calculus, particularly those focusing on differential analysis, as well as educators looking for examples of common misunderstandings in applying the Mean Value Theorem.

jacobrhcp
Messages
164
Reaction score
0
I'm going to use this theorem of differential analysis: if g(x) is differentiable between a and b, then there is a c for which [tex]\frac{g(b)-g(a)}{b-a}[/tex]=g'(c)

Let f be differentiable twice, and let f(0)=f'(0)=0 and let f''(x)[tex]\geq[/tex]1 for all x>0

choose g(x) as f'(x), a = 0, b = x
then there is a c so that:
[tex]\frac{g(b)-g(a)}{b-a}[/tex]=[tex]\frac{f'(x)}{x}[/tex]=f''(c)[tex]\geq[/tex]1 (f''(x) was already bigger then 1)

so f'(x) [tex]\geq[/tex] x (for all x > 0)

now I am going to use the theorem again, saying g(x)=f(x), a = 0, b = x

then there is a c so that:

[tex]\frac{g(b)-g(a)}{b-a}[/tex]=[tex]\frac{f(x)}{x}[/tex]=f'(c)[tex]\geq[/tex]x

so f(x) [tex]\geq[/tex] x^2 (for all x>0)

but this isn't true. The function 1/2 x^2 also applies for all those things I wanted the function to be, but is smaller than x^2. Anyone knows what I've been doing wrong? This was an old exam exercise, and it's been troubling me since before the holidays.

Ps. this is the first time I did everything with tech on this site, and it's horrible unclear to me if I entered it allright. Hope it worked. If it doesn't, I hope I'll have enough time to edit a bit before someone reads it ^_^
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
jacobrhcp said:
I'm going to use this theorem of differential analysis: if g(x) is differentiable between a and b, then there is a c for which [tex]\frac{g(b)-g(a)}{b-a}[/tex]=g'(c)

Let f be differentiable twice, and let f(0)=f'(0)=0 and let f''(x)[tex]\geq[/tex]1 for all x>0

choose g(x) as f'(x), a = 0, b = x
then there is a c so that:
[tex]\frac{g(b)-g(a)}{b-a}[/tex]=[tex]\frac{f'(x)}{x}[/tex]=f''(c)[tex]\geq[/tex]1 (f''(x) was already bigger then 1)

so f'(x) [tex]\geq[/tex] x (for all x > 0)

now I am going to use the theorem again, saying g(x)=f(x), a = 0, b = x

then there is a c so that:

[tex]\frac{g(b)-g(a)}{b-a}[/tex]=[tex]\frac{f(x)}{x}[/tex]=f'(c)[tex]\geq[/tex]x
Here's your error. You proved above that [itex]f'(x)\ge x[/itex]. That does NOT give [itex]f'(c)\ge x[/itex], only [itex]f'(c)\ge c[/itex].

so f(x) [tex]\geq[/tex] x^2 (for all x>0)

but this isn't true. The function 1/2 x^2 also applies for all those things I wanted the function to be, but is smaller than x^2. Anyone knows what I've been doing wrong? This was an old exam exercise, and it's been troubling me since before the holidays.

Ps. this is the first time I did everything with tech on this site, and it's horrible unclear to me if I entered it allright. Hope it worked. If it doesn't, I hope I'll have enough time to edit a bit before someone reads it ^_^
 
ah of course. that's great. thanks a lot.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K