I must be wrong, instantaneous speed-Conceptual ?

  • Thread starter Thread starter CherryXBOMB
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a physics problem regarding Kim's trip and the calculation of her instantaneous speed at 3 pm. The original poster argues that there is "not enough information" to determine the instantaneous speed, suggesting a misunderstanding of the problem's requirements. However, other participants clarify that the problem specifies constant speeds for defined time intervals, making it clear that the instantaneous speed matches the given speeds during those intervals. They emphasize that if speed is constant, the instantaneous speed equals the average speed for that period. The consensus is that the problem is straightforward and does not warrant the "not enough information" response.
CherryXBOMB
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Before charging into my physics teachers office to demand an explanation for my being correct and yet being marked wrong I figured I should try to back up my argument.
Kim takes a trip leaving at noon and arriving at 4 pm. Here is the breakdown of her trip: 18 m/s for 3/4 hour, 27 m/s for 3 hours and 11 m/s for 1/4 hour.
A) What was her speed at 3 pm?

Homework Equations


avg speed=distance/time? i guess?


The Attempt at a Solution


I have typed everything out exactly as it appeared in my exam (which has been handed back to us, and will not be replicated). I wrote "not enough information" because to the best of my knowledge that questions is asking for instantaneous speed not the average speed. It also doesn't distinctively say, "the trip starts at 18 m/s for 3/4 hrs" etc. etc. maybe she was riding a bus that slowed down and sped up in increments? I don't know..please help! Maybe I'm just misunderstanding the concepts?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If speed is constant, then instantaneous speed = average speed.

In this case, you have 3 different time periods during each of which Kim was traveling at a constant speed.
 
I think it's clear enough that it meant that the speed (instantaneous) was 18 m/s for 3/4 hours, etc. No way to dance around that! No reason to think average speed was meant.
 
Oh and just in addition: we specifically addressed this issue in discussion and she said using "not enough information" was a completely legitimate answer...I just don't understand how it could be wrong.
 
CherryXBOMB said:
Oh and just in addition: we specifically addressed this issue in discussion and she said using "not enough information" was a completely legitimate answer...I just don't understand how it could be wrong.
Did she say that "not enough information" was a legitimate answer in general (if you can back it up) or in regards to this particular problem?

The problem statement seems clear enough to me. I would not accept such an answer.
 
I really think that that what was meant was that during the first 3/4 of an hour, the speed was constant, and equal to 18 m/s. As I pointed out before, if the speed was constant, then the instantaneous speed at any moment during this 3/4 period will be equal to the average speed (averaged over that 3/4 hour period). Both of them are 18 m/s.

During the next interval of 3 hours, the speed is constant at 27 m/s, so any time during this time interval, the instantaneous speed is 27 m/s. Furthemore, the average speed over this time interval is 27 m/s.

Etc.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top