I think I may be on the verge of something BIG

  • Thread starter Thread starter Chris Davis
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around a high school student proposing a formula, nx=nx-1+nx-1×(n-1), as a potential fail-proof square-root formula. The student claims it has consistently worked for various n/x combinations. Responses indicate that while the formula is not new or particularly interesting to mathematicians, it may have practical applications in fields like physics. The community encourages the student to continue exploring and experimenting, acknowledging that similar formulas can sometimes lead to useful insights. Overall, the conversation highlights the balance between curiosity in mathematics and the established knowledge within the field.
Chris Davis
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I don't know if this formula already exists, but I think this may lead to finally finding the fail-proof square-root formula. What I've got now is this:

nx=nx-1+nx-1×(n-1)

I don't know if anyone else has actually discovered the above formula, but I do know that this has never failed for all the n/x combinations i have used. Let me know what you think!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Chris Davis said:
but I do know that this has never failed for all the n/x combinations i have used.
It has never failed, and it never will.n^{x-1}+n^{x-1}(n-1) = n^{x-1}+n^{x-1}\times n-n^{x-1}\times 1=n^{x-1}+n^{x}-n^{x-1}=n^x
 
I'm sorry, I'm not a mathmetician. I'm just a high school student. I'm just trying to do the impossible on the off-chance that I might actually discover something. And no, it is NOT April 1.
 
Chris Davis said:
I'm sorry, I'm not a mathmetician. I'm just a high school student. I'm just trying to do the impossible on the off-chance that I might actually discover something. And no, it is NOT April 1.
Edited out the snark. :P I'll say don't give up, but you may want some guidance. Here's an interesting site I just found that will keep you busy for a while: http://unsolvedproblems.org/
 
Thanks alot. So that formula that I put up actually WAS already discovered? Just wanting to make sure, so I don't make a fool of myself.
 
Chris Davis said:
So that formula that I put up actually WAS already discovered?
I wouldn't say it was "discovered" specifically, but it's trivial enough to prove that it isn't really of much interest to mathematicians. However, sometimes little tricks like these allow speedups in physics simulations or other codes (look up 0x5f3759df for a famous example), but you'd have to show that it's better than the existing routines.
 
okay, thanks alot. I'll keep that in mind. For now, back to my experiments!
 
TeethWhitener said:
It has never failed, and it never will.n^{x-1}+n^{x-1}(n-1) = n^{x-1}+n^{x-1}\times n-n^{x-1}\times 1=n^{x-1}+n^{x}-n^{x-1}=n^x
Or, more simply, ##n^{x - 1} + n^{x - 1}(n - 1) = n^{x - 1}(1 + n - 1) = n^{x - 1}\cdot n = n^x##
 
TeethWhitener said:
I wouldn't say it was "discovered" specifically, but it's trivial enough to prove that it isn't really of much interest to mathematicians.
In other words, if you study physics or mathematics you probably use it as a step in some proof or calculation multiple times without thinking about it.
 

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Back
Top