I think I need a better book - do not like Tipler

  • Thread starter Thread starter nocturne-e
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Book
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around the effectiveness of the "Tipler Physics for Scientists and Engineers" textbook for AP Physics C students. The original poster expresses frustration with low test scores despite completing homework and studying extensively, suggesting that the textbook may not be conducive to their learning. Participants in the discussion question the book's clarity and recommend alternatives, such as Schaum's outlines, noting that many physics textbooks can be overly complex and filled with unnecessary information. The conversation emphasizes the need for clearer resources that align better with calculus-based physics concepts, particularly in mechanics and electromagnetism.
nocturne-e
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
Has anyone used the Tipler Physics for Scientists and Engineers? I'm taking AP physics C this year and I'm not doing to hot. The only thing that is keeping me alive in that class is my daily grades. I've been making really low test grades even though I do all the homework and study for hours and hours. After making a 73% on my final, I'm determined to figure out what I'm doing wrong. I think the book might be part of the problem.

Have you had a bad experience with this book or am I just missing something?

Do you have any recommendations for better mechanics/E&M books that use caluculus?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well what specifically do you dislike about the book?
 
Try a Schuam's outline. Physics textbooks tend to be convoluted with extraneous information.
 
The book is fascinating. If your education includes a typical math degree curriculum, with Lebesgue integration, functional analysis, etc, it teaches QFT with only a passing acquaintance of ordinary QM you would get at HS. However, I would read Lenny Susskind's book on QM first. Purchased a copy straight away, but it will not arrive until the end of December; however, Scribd has a PDF I am now studying. The first part introduces distribution theory (and other related concepts), which...
I've gone through the Standard turbulence textbooks such as Pope's Turbulent Flows and Wilcox' Turbulent modelling for CFD which mostly Covers RANS and the closure models. I want to jump more into DNS but most of the work i've been able to come across is too "practical" and not much explanation of the theory behind it. I wonder if there is a book that takes a theoretical approach to Turbulence starting from the full Navier Stokes Equations and developing from there, instead of jumping from...

Similar threads

Replies
26
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
6K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Back
Top