I want to think like a physicist

  • Thread starter Thread starter lou6
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physicist
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the desire to regain a physicist's mindset after experiencing setbacks that diminished enthusiasm for physics. The individual reflects on past challenges, particularly related to algebra-based physics courses, and expresses a need to rediscover their passion for the subject. Suggestions include revisiting foundational concepts through recommended textbooks, such as "Applications of Classical Physics" by Blandford and Thorne and "Mathematical Biology" by J. D. Murray. The conversation also touches on the evolving nature of biology as a quantitative discipline, encouraging exploration of mathematical interpretations in areas of personal interest within biology to enhance quantitative thinking skills. Overall, the focus is on rekindling a love for physics and integrating it with other scientific fields.
lou6
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
I want to think like a " physicist"

i used to use the scientific methodology in inquiring about things and interpreting actions and interactions, However, stuff happens, and I had "not" so good" a couple of years that reduced the ability to think like a physicist and to love physics to a limit that it becomes second hand. What should I do to get this urge back? Any clues? I am thinking that relearning the basics will help me rediscover my love. What do you think? Help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What "stuff"? (Dare I ask?)

Hi, lou6,

Your allusion to "stuff" which "reduced the ability to think like a physicist" is a bit worrying. I assume you mean something like bad experiences in physics courses. If so, the first thought which comes to mind is to suggest that you set aside time to study two books: the excellent on-line textbook by Blandford and Thorne, Applications of Classical Physics, which you can download at http://www.pma.caltech.edu/Courses/ph136/yr2004/ and the textbook by J. D. Murray, Mathematical Biology, 2nd edition, Springer, 1993.
 
Chris Hillman said:
Hi, lou6,

Your allusion to "stuff" which "reduced the ability to think like a physicist" is a bit worrying. I assume you mean something like bad experiences in physics courses. If so, the first thought which comes to mind is to suggest that you set aside time to study two books: the excellent on-line textbook by Blandford and Thorne, Applications of Classical Physics, which you can download at http://www.pma.caltech.edu/Courses/ph136/yr2004/ and the textbook by J. D. Murray, Mathematical Biology, 2nd edition, Springer, 1993.

I had some problems/distractions when I took two "algebra-based" physics courses last year...
 
Algebra-based physics courses? You mean like, Groebner basis methods? Or universal algebra? Or maybe category theory as per Robert Geroch, Mathematical Physics? Where was this?

Just curious.

By problems/distractions do you mean something like a divorce, or something like a prison sentence for a drug offence, or what?

(If you feel comfortable with answering that in general terms...)
 
Chris Hillman said:
Algebra-based physics courses? You mean like, Groebner basis methods? Or universal algebra? Or maybe category theory as per Robert Geroch, Mathematical Physics? Where was this?

Just curious.

By problems/distractions do you mean something like a divorce, or something like a prison sentence for a drug offence, or what?

(If you feel comfortable with answering that in general terms...)

-Algebra-based Physics courses are the courses given for life sciences/health majors. They are not based on calculus.
- No, I don't want to underestimate the "distractions", but they weren't a divorce or stuff like that. I arrived to a point where I didn't know what I want and didn't know, and was lost. I figured a lot of things out since then. Hope that clears things out.
 
Biology is becoming a much more quantitative disciple. There are now a lot of ways to develop quantitative thinking skills without leaving biology. You could try learning about physical/mathematical interpretations of an area of biology that interests you. If you let us know what area of biology you are in, we could probably point you to some relevant quantitative areas...
 
For example, Murray is an expert on modeling pattern formation, so his textbook is very good for that.
 

Similar threads

Replies
32
Views
384
Replies
33
Views
8K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Back
Top