MHB Ibv9 The triangle ABC is defined by the following vectors

  • Thread starter Thread starter karush
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Triangle Vectors
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around defining the triangle ABC using vector notation, specifically focusing on the vector OC. Participants confirm the x-component of OC as 2, while the y-component is noted as 3.25. There is a request for clarification on the notation used for OC. The conversation emphasizes the importance of accurate representation in vector notation. Overall, the participants engage positively, celebrating the correct identification of the vector components.
karush
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,240
Reaction score
5
View attachment 1227
this is best I can figure for the triangle (shaded)
but $$\vec{OC}$$ looks like it has decimals in it.
View attachment 1226
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Good picture, I think. Can you write down the $x$-component of $OC$ immediately? If so, can you think of a way, maybe, to write down an equation governing where the $y$-component must be?
 
At $x=2, y=\frac{13}{4}$
 
karush said:
At $x=2, y=\frac{13}{4}$

You've got it, except for notation. $OC=?$
 
Ackbach said:
You've got it, except for notation. $OC=?$

$$\vec{OC} = \pmatrix{2 \\ 3.25}$$:D
 
karush said:
$$\vec{OC} = \pmatrix{2 \\ 3.25}$$:D

(Clapping)
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...

Similar threads

Back
Top