IceCube sees astrophysical neutrinos

  • Thread starter Thread starter marcus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Neutrinos
AI Thread Summary
IceCube has detected high-energy astrophysical neutrinos, primarily originating from outside the solar system, with some rare instances likely coming from extragalactic sources. Although the observatory has observed neutrinos above 100 TeV, no specific sources have yet been identified, despite ongoing efforts to correlate these findings with other astronomical observations. The current understanding suggests that many of these neutrinos may arise from high-energy cosmic events, such as protons colliding and producing pions that decay into neutrinos. There is a debate on whether to wait for more data from IceCube or to develop more sensitive instruments to advance neutrino astrophysics. The discussion highlights the potential for new discoveries in understanding the origins of these high-energy neutrinos.
marcus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
Messages
24,753
Reaction score
794
http://inspirehep.net/record/1382926?ln=en
PRL, 8 pages, 4 figures +supplementary material
most neutrinos IceCube detects originated locally---e.g. from cosmic ray particles hitting Earth's atmosphere. But extra high energy neutrinos are more likely to come from outside solar system.
As I understand it, they've been finding some rare ones that don't even come from in the plane of the Milkyway galaxy.
http://nycity.today/content/284365-existence-cosmic-neutrinos-confirmed-help-antarctic-icecube-neutrino-observatory
rightly or not the headline in this popular media says "existence of cosmic neutrinos confirmed..."
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
http://arxiv.org/abs/1507.07871
IceCube at the Threshold
Thomas K. Gaisser, for the IceCube Collaboration
(Submitted on 28 Jul 2015)
IceCube has observed neutrinos above 100 TeV at a level significantly above the steeply falling background of atmospheric neutrinos. The astrophysical signal is seen both in the high-energy starting event analysis from the whole sky and as a high-energy excess in the signal of neutrino-induced muons from below. No individual neutrino source, either steady or transient, has yet been identified. Several follow-up efforts are currently in place in an effort to find coincidences with sources observed by optical, X-ray and gamma-ray detectors. This paper, presented at the inauguration of HAWC, reviews the main results of IceCube and describes the status of plans to move to near-real time publication of high-energy events by IceCube.
Presentation on behalf of IceCube at the Inauguration of HAWC, Puebla, March 19, 2015. Fifteen figures with updated references
 
marcus said:
rare ones
Are there any alternative "local" sources?
 
I hope some others will comment. I've been looking at Gaisser's article. This indicates that they have identified a particular small sample of neutrinos which are most likely of extragalactic origin. they have not identified specific sources, as yet. I hope you have a look at Gaisser http://arxiv.org/abs/1507.07871 and let us know what you make of it.
==quote pages 12-13 of Gaisser==
Many, if not all, of the astrophysical events in the HESE sample are most likely of extragalactic origin. Ahlers & Halzen [39] show that, in this case, it is possible to use the observed luminosity density of the HESE flux (e.g. from Eq. 1) together with the upper limits from the point source search (Eq. 5) to constrain the classes of sources responsible for the astrophysical neutrino flux in IceCube. The argument is basically geometric, comparing the integral over the neutrinos from all sources in the Universe with the flux from a typical nearby source [40]. ...
...
IceCube is currently in the position of having discovered high-energy astro- physical neutrinos without yet establishing what the sources are. Upper limits are placing significant constraints on particular classes of potential sources. For example, although blazars are attractive candidates [38], an analysis of the Fermi-LAT catalog of blazars [42] concludes that the sources in that catalog cannot count for more that about 20% of the observed astrophysical flux. Starburst galaxies [43] are an attractive potential class of sources, in part because of their relatively low luminosity and relatively high density. On the other hand, depending on how steeply the astrophysical spectrum extends to low energy [44], they may be in conflict with Fermi observations of the diffuse gamma-ray background [45]. ...
===endquote===
 
Last edited:
Perhaps now the question is, do you just wait longer for IceCube to compile more data, or do you build an instrument with more sensitivity? This would usher in a new branch of neutrino astrophysics.
 
Ken G said:
Perhaps now the question is, do you just wait longer for IceCube to compile more data, or do you build an instrument with more sensitivity? This would usher in a new branch of neutrino astrophysics.
If we can string a few cups together, I'll build one in my bedroom.

But seriously, what kind of phenomena can potentially give rise to 100 TeV neutrinos?
 
Drakkith said:
But seriously, what kind of phenomena can potentially give rise to 100 TeV neutrinos?
Generally the decay of other things that are easier to accelerate. I think a common reaction is high energy protons smack into something, creating pions, which decay in part into neutrinos. So the neutrinos are just kind of the slop left over from some really high-energy acceleration event. But 100 TeV isn't even all that much-- the highest energy cosmic rays are a million times more energetic than that-- so energetic that a single particle has the energy of a well-thrown baseball. The goal is to detect ZeV particles, though these must be quite rare!
 
Thanks, Ken! I wouldn't have thought that they'd come from something as simple as a high-speed decaying particle!
 
Back
Top