I'd like to see your point of view

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter krtica
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Point
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the contrasting views of planetary motion by Isaac Newton and Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz during the Modern period. Newton's description of motion through force is challenged by Leibniz, who critiques it as an "occult quality" and advocates for a mechanical explanation involving "impressed impetus." Leibniz's vortex theory serves as an alternative to Newton's force-based model. The conversation invites insights from experienced physicists to clarify the intelligibility of Newton's explanations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newtonian mechanics
  • Familiarity with Leibniz's philosophical concepts
  • Knowledge of vortex theory in physics
  • Basic principles of planetary motion
NEXT STEPS
  • Research Newton's laws of motion in detail
  • Explore Leibniz's contributions to mechanics and philosophy
  • Study the implications of vortex theory on planetary motion
  • Investigate the historical context of the Scientific Revolution
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, historians of science, and anyone interested in the foundational debates of classical mechanics.

krtica
Messages
50
Reaction score
0
During the Modern period, planetary motion was described by Newton through force. Leibniz thought Newton was turning planetary motion to an "occult quality", as something not fully intelligible. Leibniz viewed the proper explanation as being completely mechanical, that only by an "impressed impetus" can an object move. As his antithesis, Leibniz proposed the vortex theory as being responsible for planetary motion.

This is a very brief preface, but do you believe that Newton's explanation of planetary force is intelligible? I am beginning my studies in physics and find its progression fascinating. I am interested to read responses from those who have been in physics much longer than I.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
krtica said:
do you believe that Newton's explanation of planetary force is intelligible?
Yes, which part of it confuses you?
 

Similar threads

Graduate PDE: Between Physics and Mathematics
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
Undergrad Energy conservation in Doppler (NOT cosmological) redshifts?
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
Graduate Is Fatio–Le Sage's theory of gravitation an entropic gravity?
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
3K
Graduate Is delayed choice remote entanglement of photons derived from TDSE?
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
5K
Graduate Focus all of your ire on me, if you would
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Graduate "GR from RG" (dynamical gravity from renormalization group flow)
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
673
Graduate In light of new evidence, what might be behind the Casimir Effect?
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
6K
Photon-Foil FTL Drive theory
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Undergrad New Paper Claims Primordial Black Holes Don't Explain Dark Matter
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
Undergrad Debunking the Myth of the Devil's Racetrack in Death Valley
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K