Idea for black body source

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the feasibility of using an integrating sphere with an incandescent lamp as a low-tech calibration source for radiation thermometers, particularly in the context of ensuring their functionality between calibrations against a calibrated black body radiation source. The conversation includes considerations of alternative methods and the challenges associated with maintaining the integrity of optical components in high-temperature environments.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes using an integrating sphere with an incandescent lamp to create a calibration source for radiation thermometers.
  • Another participant suggests using a hotplate with a settable temperature for quicker checks, noting that uncertainties may be high regardless of the method used.
  • A third participant mentions the challenges of damage to fibre optic leads and lenses in their commercial black body reference and expresses a need for a frequent checking method.
  • This participant also indicates they are considering using a diffuser in conjunction with the original idea of the integrating sphere.
  • There is acknowledgment of the limitations of using a hotplate due to the high temperature range required for their instruments.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing opinions on the best approach for calibration checks, with some supporting the integrating sphere idea while others suggest alternatives like a hotplate. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the optimal solution.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the potential for high uncertainties in calibration methods and the specific challenges posed by the temperature range of the instruments being used. There are also concerns about the durability of optical components in the proposed setups.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to professionals working with radiation thermometers, calibration techniques, and those facing similar challenges in maintaining optical instruments in high-temperature environments.

mookins
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I am trying to implement a low tech, quick "check" source for our radiation thermometers to ensure they are in good working order between calibrations again a calibrated black body radiation source.

My idea was to use an integrating sphere with an incandescent lamp as a source. Then two signals would be tapped from the sphere via fibre optic leads and then fed into two radiation thermometers. One of the two radiation thermometers would be an offline unit which is known to be in good working order, unlike those used in production.

I just want to know if this sounds feasible to you before I go drop a bit of cash having a go at it.
 
Science news on Phys.org
mookins said:
Hi,

I am trying to implement a low tech, quick "check" source for our radiation thermometers to ensure they are in good working order between calibrations again a calibrated black body radiation source.

My idea was to use an integrating sphere with an incandescent lamp as a source. Then two signals would be tapped from the sphere via fibre optic leads and then fed into two radiation thermometers. One of the two radiation thermometers would be an offline unit which is known to be in good working order, unlike those used in production.

I just want to know if this sounds feasible to you before I go drop a bit of cash having a go at it.

Here's a good paper on calibration and associated uncertainties: http://www.bipm.org/wg/CCT/CCT-WG5/Allowed/Miscellaneous/Low_T_Uncertainty_Paper_Version_1.71.pdf

Your idea will work, but for a quicker check why not use something like a hotplate with a settable temperature? The uncertainties are likely to be high regardless.

There are commercial black body sources you could purchase if you need higher accuracy, intergrating sphere's aren't the cheapest things in the world either. :smile:
 
Last edited:
Hi,

We have a commercial black body reference, a Mikron M335. Unfortunately due to the nature of the process, damage to the fibre optic leads and lenses is hard to avoid and common. We would like a way to check the instruments weekly, even daily if possible to ensure there is no recent damage that may have ocured to the lens or fibre optic lead.

The instruments are dual wavelength ratiometric pyrometers and measure from 700°C up to 1800°C. Due to the temperature range a hotplate soon becomes a miniature furnace and with that comes a whole host of other issues.

I am pursuing the original idea, but with a diffuser, https://www.thorlabs.com/newgrouppage9.cfm?objectgroup_id=1660&pn=ED1-C20-MD
If that works well but needs something better I can then try an integrating sphere.

Thanks for the assistance, much appreciated and I will be sure to report back.
 
mookins said:
Hi,

We have a commercial black body reference, a Mikron M335. Unfortunately due to the nature of the process, damage to the fibre optic leads and lenses is hard to avoid and common. We would like a way to check the instruments weekly, even daily if possible to ensure there is no recent damage that may have ocured to the lens or fibre optic lead.

The instruments are dual wavelength ratiometric pyrometers and measure from 700°C up to 1800°C. Due to the temperature range a hotplate soon becomes a miniature furnace and with that comes a whole host of other issues.

I am pursuing the original idea, but with a diffuser, https://www.thorlabs.com/newgrouppage9.cfm?objectgroup_id=1660&pn=ED1-C20-MD
If that works well but needs something better I can then try an integrating sphere.

Thanks for the assistance, much appreciated and I will be sure to report back.

Yes, no doubt those temps are a bit warm for the ol hot plate trick. :)

Good luck.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 152 ·
6
Replies
152
Views
11K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
6K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
4K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K