Ideal Gas Law: What is the new pressure based on factors?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a homework problem involving the Ideal Gas Law, specifically how to calculate the new pressure of a gas when its volume, temperature, and number of moles change. Participants explore different methods and equations to arrive at a solution, examining both theoretical and practical aspects of the Ideal Gas Law.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant outlines the problem and their approach using the Ideal Gas Law, expressing uncertainty about their calculations and seeking confirmation.
  • Another participant suggests using the equation (P1xV1)/(n1xT1) = (P2xV2)/(n2xT2) to account for changes in moles, offering to explain their reasoning.
  • Some participants express confusion about how to apply the suggested equation without knowing the initial number of moles, as they only know it quadrupled.
  • One participant proposes breaking the problem into simpler steps: calculating the initial moles, multiplying by four, and then solving for the new pressure.
  • Another participant reflects on their previous approach and suggests that they may have incorrectly included the value of R in their calculations.
  • Several participants share their calculations and results, with some arriving at the same final pressure of 0.257 atm, while others express uncertainty about their methods.
  • A participant emphasizes the importance of understanding the underlying principles rather than just relying on equations, suggesting a more intuitive approach to the problem.
  • Another participant offers guidance on how to properly format equations for clarity in future discussions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

There is no clear consensus on the best approach to solve the problem, with multiple competing views and methods presented. Participants express varying degrees of confidence in their calculations and reasoning, leading to different interpretations of the Ideal Gas Law.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note limitations in their understanding of how to apply the Ideal Gas Law in this context, particularly regarding the treatment of moles and the use of constants like R. There are also unresolved questions about why certain approaches yield different results.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for students learning about the Ideal Gas Law, educators looking for examples of problem-solving approaches, and anyone interested in the application of gas laws in physics and chemistry.

ptownbro
Messages
60
Reaction score
0
My daughter has the following homework problem we need assistance in confirming if we've understood and completed correctly.

Homework Statement



The Volume goes from 2.00 Liters to 7.00 Liters, the temperature changes from 800 kelvin to 150 kelvin, and the number moles of gas is quadrupled on a gas sample initially at 1.20 atm. What is the new pressure?

Homework Equations



PV = nRT, where P = pressure, V = volume, n = moles, R = a given number at 0.0821, and T = temperature.

The Attempt at a Solution



We assumed that since moles was used here, we need to use the "PV = nRT" version of the ideal gas equation versus the "P1V1 / T1 = P2V2 / T2" version. Given that, we also assumed we'd have to apply the factor of the changes in each applicable variable.

Volume factor = 7 / 2 = 3.5
Temperature factor = 150 / 800 = 0.1875
Moles factor = 4

Therefore, mathematically, logic stands you can apply the product of those factors to the given starting pressure amount of 1.20 atm to get the new pressure amount.

PV = nRT
P = nRT / V
P = [ (4 n) x (0.0821) x (0.1875 T) ] / (3.5 V)
P = [ (4 x 0.0821 x 0.1875) / 3.5 ] x (nT / V)
P = 0.0176 nT / V

Your factor is therefore 0.0176 which can be applied to the original pressure to get your new pressure.

Answer:

P = 1.2 atm x 0.0176
P = 0.0211 atm

Can you please confirm if our logic and answer is correct and if not where we went wrong?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can actually use the following:
(P1xV1)/(n1xT1)=((P2xV2)/(n2xT2)
it accounts for the change in moles also.

If you want me to show you why this is, i can show you.
 
Paul I. said:
(P1xV1)/(n1xT1)=((P2xV2)/(n2xT2)

That's interesting. Didn't know you could do that. Yes, be interested in seeing how you got to there.

However, I don't think I can use it here because I don't know what the original moles are. I just know they quadrupled.
 
Oh ok. Yes, then in that case, since you know the initial temperature, pressure, and volume. You can then solve for the amount of moles. Once you have the answer for the amount of initial moles, you can multiply that by 4, then solve for the final pressure. That's how i would go about it.
 
Paul I. said:
Oh ok. Yes, then in that case, since you know the initial temperature, pressure, and volume. You can then solve for the amount of moles. Once you have the answer for the amount of initial moles, you can multiply that by 4, then solve for the final pressure. That's how i would go about it.

Would you mind demonstrating?
 
I solved it in this image:
Hopefully it's what you're looking for!
 

Attachments

  • 12176291_1034836329880092_1733206815_o.jpg
    12176291_1034836329880092_1733206815_o.jpg
    29 KB · Views: 516
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ptownbro
ptownbro said:
Given that, we also assumed we'd have to apply the factor of the changes in each applicable variable.

While technically that could be possible, it didn't yield the correct answer (but I have not checked why), and it is the most complicated way of dealing with the problem I can think of.

Why not split it into two simple problems:

1. Calculate number of moles present in the initial conditions.

2. Multiply by 4.

3. Calculate new pressure knowing n, R, T and V.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ptownbro
Ah. Makes total sense. Don't know why I didn't think of that approach. Should have kept it simple.

Still... not sure why mathematically our approach doesn't work since logically you should be able to apply the product of the ratios/factors.

For example, here's another problem where we used basically the same principals. And we THINK we got it right.

Question:
The pressure doubles, the absolute temperate triples, and the number of moles becomes 1/6 as great on a 1.2 L nitrogen sample. What is the new gas volume?

Our Answer:
PV = nRT
V = nRT / P
V = [ (1/6 n) x (0.0821) x (3 T) ] / (2 P)
V = [ (1/6 x 0.0821 x 3) / 2 ] x (nT / P)
V = 0.02025 nT / P
V = 1.2 L x 0.02025
V = 0.02463 L

In this case, you aren't given any values except factors. So, not sure how we could use your approach.

If I can infringe on a little more of your time... how would you go about that one?

Thanks
 
Borek said:
Why not split it into two simple problems: 1. Calculate number of moles present in the initial conditions. 2. Multiply by 4. 3. Calculate new pressure knowing n, R, T and V.

Yes. This seems like same suggestion as Paul. Thanks to you too!

Yet... still not sure how you would apply it to a similar question where we used that answer. See my other reply to Paul.
 
  • #10
Wait! I think I figured it out!

I don't think I was supposed to include the given amount for "R" at 0.0821 in my approach to figure out the factor amount.

PV = nRT
P = nRT / V
P = [ (4 n) x (R) x (0.1875 T) ] / (3.5 V) <----- Used that instead of: [ (4 n) x (0.0821) x (0.1875 T) ] / (3.5 V)
P = [ (4 x 0.1875) / 3.5 ] x (nRT / V)
P = 0.2143 nRT / V
P = 1.2 atm x 0.2143
P = 0.2571 atm

The same answer that Paul got

This makes sense because

P = nRT / V

So the factor would need to be applied to "nRT / V" and not "nT / V" as I did in my original.
 
  • #11
i hope it's not too messy. i used the equation i suggested before. then i just ended up using the coefficients and canceled out the P, n, and T. hope this makes sense.
 

Attachments

  • 12180590_1034843363212722_1421016600_o.jpg
    12180590_1034843363212722_1421016600_o.jpg
    28.9 KB · Views: 466
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ptownbro
  • #12
0.257 atm is what I got too.

Sorry, no time for more ATM.

Edit: and I can confirm 0.3 L for the second problem.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ptownbro
  • #13
here's how my equation came up to be. this is how i learned it.
 

Attachments

  • 12168588_1034843889879336_587865666_o.jpg
    12168588_1034843889879336_587865666_o.jpg
    24.4 KB · Views: 470
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ptownbro
  • #14
Seems like you got it! Glad you are able to understand it! I'll say goodnight to you and hope to be able to help you in the future!
 
  • #15
  • #16
Awesome. Thanks to both.

My adjusted approach (which now I know and admit is likely overly complicated) also gets 0.3 L.

PV = nRT
V = nRT / P
V = [ (1/6 n) x (R) x (3 T) ] / (2 P)
V = [ (1/6 x 3) / 2 ] x (nRT / P)
V = 0.25 nRT / P
V = 1.2 L x 0.25
V = 0.3 L

I think we get it now.

Thanks again!

Going to bed now. =)
 
  • #17
Put to your daughter the way I would have done it, because I don't like to see young students struggling hard with easy things that they will then forget because they seem complicated. (And OK you do have to know some semi-elementary things for this, dependence on mass density, Boyle's Law, Charles' Laws, meaning of absolute temperature. And OK,Borek has said more or less the same thing,)

I'd just say: the pressure was so much. Then into the same volume I have pushed 4× as much stuff, mass so pressure is now



I have then let it expand to 7/2 × what it was, in other words made the density 2/7 × what it was

2/7 ×

then I have cooled it to 150/800 of what it was so pressure becomes

150/800 ×

what is was after the last operations: in all its pressure has become

4× 2/7 × 150/800 × than the 1.2 atm it originally was I.e. 0.257 atm , in agreement with others.

Simple proportions come into so many quantitative chemistry questions. Hope this helps your daughter.

Not to disdain the equations in the end, have to know about R etc., but helps make plain and less intimidating what they mean.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Borek
  • #18
Borek said:
I suggest you read this thread: https://www.physicsforums.com/help/latexhelp/

Will save you taking hard to read pictures :)
Yes thank you!I knew it was possible to write equations but i didn't know how because it looked highly complicated when ifirst tried! I'll be able to practice and make sure i know what I'm doing now!
 
  • #19
Here is how I derived the equation to solve for final pressure. This show's you where your idea of multiplying by ratios could work if done properly. You don't need to calculate the moles in the beginning, then multiply by 4, then stick new number in...the moles cancel out as you'll see...
plug ur numbers in and see if this gives you the right solution; and remember to watch your units
gas problem.jpg
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
7K