Identifying a Weak Acid: Solving for pH in a 0.50 mol/L Solution - Homework Help

AI Thread Summary
A 0.50 mol/L solution of a weak acid with a pH of 3.18 suggests a hydronium ion concentration of approximately 6.6 x 10^-4 mol/L. The calculated acid dissociation constant (Ka) is 8.75 x 10^-7, indicating that carbonic acid is the closest match, with a Ka of 4.4 x 10^-7. However, the pKa of 6.05 does not align well with common weak acids studied in introductory chemistry. While carbonic acid is a potential candidate, its pKa1 of 6.37 indicates a discrepancy. The discussion highlights the challenges in identifying weak acids based on pH and dissociation constants.
Euler2718
Messages
90
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement



What is the likely identity of a weak acid if a 0.50 mol/L solution of the acid has a pH of 3.18?

Homework Equations



HA + H2O <=> H3O + A

K_{a} = \frac{[P]}{[R]}

[H3O] = 10^{-pH}

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
I set up an ICE table with the concentration given, then solved for x using the inverse log formula for [H3O], finally I did the following Ka expression:

K_{a} = \frac{(6.6 \times 10^{-4})^{2}}{0.5-6.6 \times 10^{-4}} = 8.75 \times 10^{-7}

The closets acid to that appears to be carbonic acid (ka = 4.4x10^-7). Any suggestions?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You've doubly ionized a diprotic weak acid at a pH of 3.2? Try it again.
 
Bystander said:
You've doubly ionized a diprotic weak acid at a pH of 3.2? Try it again.

I am not sure what you mean, Ka is calculated assuming the acid behaves as a monoprotic. That's not a bad assumption for a carbonic acid (no idea if the OP was aware of the problem, but that's another story).

Sadly, pKa of 6.05 doesn't fit any acid commonly used in introductory chemistry courses. Of those used carbonic acid looks best (but still is way off with the pKa1=6.37).
 
  • Like
Likes Euler2718
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top