I Identity Operator for Multiple Particles

acegikmoqsuwy
Messages
41
Reaction score
4
Hi,

For a particle in a box (so that the momentum spectrum is discrete), we can write the identity operator as a sum over all momentum eigenstates of a projection to that eigenstate: $$I=\displaystyle\sum\limits_{p} |p\rangle\langle p|.$$

I was wondering what the corresponding form of the identity operator would be if we had multiple particles? In particular, a sum over both momenta appears to not lead to normalized states (when the particles are identical): $$A=\displaystyle\sum\limits_p\sum\limits_q |p,q\rangle\langle p,q|.$$ For example, given two possible momentum states for each particle 0 and 1, $$A=\sum\limits_{p=0}^1\sum\limits_{q=0}^1 |p,q\rangle\langle p,q|,$$ we find that $$A|0,1\rangle = |0,1\rangle +|1,0\rangle\langle 1,0|0,1\rangle=|0,1\rangle\pm|1,0\rangle$$ where the + sign is taken if the particles are both bosons and the minus sign if they are both fermions.

This looks like what we're supposed to get up to a normalization constant. I'm trying to figure out exactly how to modify the operator A so that the normalization constant works out. In particular, just dividing A by root 2 to fix this problem, $$A = \dfrac 1{\sqrt 2} \sum\limits_{p=0}^1\sum\limits_{q=0}^1 |p,q\rangle\langle p,q|,$$ we find that $$A|0,0\rangle = \dfrac 1{\sqrt 2}|0,0\rangle$$ which is not normalized.

Any help would be appreciated. Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't know what the most elegant way is to deal with Fermions and Bosons, but one approach is to say that the complete basis does not respect the statistics, and require an additional constraint on physical states that they must be symmetric or antisymmetric.

To make it simple, let's only consider spin degrees of freedom. A complete basis for a single particle is ##|U\rangle## and ##|D\rangle## (spin-up and spin-down along the z-axis, say). A complete basis for a two-particle state is the four states:
  1. ##|U,U\rangle##
  2. ##|U,D\rangle##
  3. ##|D,U\rangle##
  4. ##|D,D\rangle##
The inner product of two states is component-wise:

##\langle X, Y|X, Y\rangle = 1##
##\langle X, Y|X', Y'\rangle = 0## if ##X \neq X'## or ##Y \neq Y'##

So obviously, the identity for two-particle states is:

##I = |U,U\rangle \langle U,U| + |U,D\rangle \langle U,D| + |D,U\rangle \langle D,U| + |D,D\rangle \langle D,D| ##

With this basis, the only two-particle state that respects Fermi antisymmetry is:

##|0\rangle \equiv \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} (|U,D\rangle - |D,U\rangle)##

And it's clear that ##I |0\rangle = |0\rangle##

In terms of the unsymmetrized basis, ##\langle U, D|D, U\rangle = 0##, not ##-1##.
 
If you have a complete orthonormalized set of vectors ##|u_n \rangle##, then
$$\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} |u_n \rangle \langle u_n|=\mathbb{1}.$$
For your case you have single-particle states ##|p_n \rangle## with ##p_n=2 \pi n \hbar/L##, ##n \in \mathbb{Z}## (for the case of particles in a box with periodic boundary conditions; for rigid boundary conditions this makes no sense at all, because you cannot even define a momentum observable to begin with), forming a complete set of one-particle states.

If you consider two identical particles the Hilbert space is spanned by the totally symmetrized (antisymmetrized) Kronecker-product states,
$$|p_{1j},p_{2k} \rangle=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} (|p_{1i} \rangle \otimes |p_{2j} \rangle \pm |p_{2j} \rangle \otimes |p_{1i}).$$
These states are orthonormal, i.e.,
$$\langle p_{1j},p_{2k}|p_{1j'},p_{2k'} \rangle=\delta_{jj'} \delta_{kk'}.$$
The completeness relation then reads
$$\sum_{j,k} |p_{1j},p_{2k} \rangle \langle p_{1j},p_{2k}|=\mathbb{1}.$$
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
944
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
432
Back
Top