If a 235 lb person falls 2 stories in an elevator

  • Thread starter Thread starter Orbit
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Elevator
AI Thread Summary
A 235-pound man claims he was injured in a two-story elevator free-fall, but only reports a bruise and seeks significant compensation. The discussion highlights that injury severity depends more on the abruptness of the elevator's stop than on the fall itself, as most modern elevators have safety systems that prevent sudden stops. Calculations show that if the elevator fell freely, the man would have reached a speed of approximately 27 miles per hour, generating around 8,000 joules of kinetic energy. However, without evidence of a sudden stop, the validity of his injury claim is questioned. Consulting an elevator technician and a medical expert is recommended to assess the situation further.
Orbit
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I have a situation wherein a 235pound 30 year old man claims that he was in an elevator at our company and that the elevator free-fell 2 stories and injured his knee.

However, the man is claiming that his total injury is a bruise (but he wants a lot of money from us). I'm having a hard time believeing he would not have been more hurt if this happened the way he says it did and thus I question his entire story. I wnat to be able to go to my boss with some science to justify spending more money to fight this claim - if I'm wrong i just assume find out here. :confused:

Can someone help me out with determining how fast this guy would have been falling in miles per hour or even feet per second.

I am merely an associate lawyer and I'm really having a hard time converting meters per second into miles per hour and I know the 235 pound is relevant to how hard he would hit, but I'm not sure how it works into the equation and I need to be able to explain this in terms that my boss will understand. I'm figuring two stories is about 20-25 feet (right?).

Please forgive my ignorance and thank you for your assistance.

Red
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Is there any other evidence to support a claim that the elevator fell?

With freefall, the speed at the bottom in miles per hour is

v = 5.47 \sqrt H

But that is only half the problem. The amount damage and injury also depend on important details like the construction of the elevator and the type of cushioning or buffering.
 
There are many points that must be considered.

1) Let's take care of the basics first. Converting between units is a pain -- so don't do it! Let google do it for you:

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&...s+per+second)+in+(miles+per+hour)&btnG=Search

2) It is not speed that causes injury -- it is acceleration, the change in speed over time, that causes injury. Even if the man fell a large distance, he would not be hurt unless the elevator car came to an abrupt stop. If the car came to an abrupt stop, he would hit the floor hard, experiencing a large change in speed over a short time. If instead the elevator car came to a gentle and gradual stop due to its brakes engaging, the acceleration would be mild, spread over time, and any injury would be minimal.

In short, even if the elevator did fall freely for two stories, that knowledge is irrelevant. The only bit that's relevant is how abruptly the car stopped falling.

I am not qualified to be an expert witness in elevator designs, but I believe the majority of elevators in service today use both electromagnetic and mechanically-actuated braking systems, both of which should respond faster than two stories, and both of which are designed to slowly bring the car to a stop. An abrupt stop requires large forces and would as dangerous to the cables and other supporting structures as to the occupants.

You would do well to contact an elevator technician, particularly one who is knowledgeable about the building's equipment, and ask him how quickly the elevator car decelerates (in m/s^2) when its brakes are engaged. From this information, you can determine how much force was applied to the man, and the likely severity of the resulting injury.

3) Let's work the numbers you requested.

The speed of a body falling freely in the Earth's gravitational influence is

v = \sqrt{2 g h}

where g = 9.8 m/s^2 and h is the distance fallen.

Plugging in the numbers, the man would have been traveling at a little over 12 m/s, or a little over 27 miles per hour, after falling 25 feet.

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&ie=UTF-8&q=sqrt(2+*+(9.8+m/s/s)+*+25+feet)&btnG=Google+Search
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&...m/s/s)+*+25+feet)+in+mi/hr&btnG=Google+Search

If the elevator fell freely for two stories, say 25 feet, the 235 lb man inside it would have gained about 8,000 joules of kinetic energy:

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&q=235+pounds+*+(9.8+m/s/s)+*+25+feet&btnG=Search

8,000 joules is about as much energy as a 60W light-bulb burns in two minutes. It's certainly enough to hurt a person very badly, particularly if they happen to fall in a position which applies a lot the force to a particular joint.

4) You might want to speak to the prosecution's medical doctor to determine the severity of the injury.

5) Welcome to physicsforums!

- Warren
 
Talk to another lawyer.
 
Thank you all so much

Thank you for your advice it was very helpful and pretty dang close to what I figued his velocity would be.

He is claiming that the elevator came to a sudden stop, but there is no other evidence to support this contention, plus his injuries are at most slight (probably pre-existent). This is why I initially questioned his story.

Thank you all for your time and brains. :smile:

Red
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top