If a person passes near me at Mach 2 speed would I see him?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter genu6
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mach Speed
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

A person moving at Mach 2 (1522 mph or 2469.6 km/h) would be visible to an observer within a 2-3 meter radius, but details would be minimal, resulting in a brief blur. The human visual system is not adapted to detect supersonic speeds, leading to a lack of detail recognition as the object passes. The ability to see an object diminishes significantly at higher speeds, with bullets being undetectable due to their rapid motion compared to larger objects like aircraft. The discussion highlights the limitations of human perception in relation to speed and object size.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Mach speed and its implications
  • Basic knowledge of human visual perception
  • Familiarity with the concept of visual processing speed
  • Awareness of object size and its effect on visibility
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the physics of supersonic travel and its visual effects
  • Explore human visual processing and limitations at high speeds
  • Study the differences in visibility between various object sizes at high velocities
  • Investigate the impact of environmental factors on perception of fast-moving objects
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, cognitive scientists, visual perception researchers, and anyone interested in the effects of speed on human observation.

genu6
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
If a person is moving at Mach2 (1522 mph/h , 2469.6 km/h) and he passes close by me in a radius of 2-3 meters, would I be able to see him? Please for the sake of the question, ignore sound effects, sound barrier details etc. I'm only interested in the speed and the visual part. IF yes, what exactly am I going to see? A short term blur with very little details or more like everything?

Also, if I see him at that speed, what speed do you think he's going to need to be moving at in order for me not to see him at all? (e.g. bullet)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The answer to this will be mostly determined by the rate at which the visual cortex of the brain is able process signals incoming from the optic nerves, and the speed + amount (bandwidth?), of signals that the optic nerves themselves are capable of.
I would think this could vary between different individuals, (well maybe not the signal transmission rate).
The size of the passing object makes a difference too.
It is as you say impossible to see a bullet in flight, but an aircraft traveling at the same speed would be visible.

My guess is that you would see an object the size of a person approaching, but wouldn't really register much detail at the stage of it passing by.
Our visual systems have not evolved in an environment whereby there would be an advantage in noticing supersonic objects.
However they DID evolve in an environment whereby minute movements of objects are readily seen, and that certainly would have an advantage.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: genu6
Thank you, that's very informative! :)

Imagine however you are standing at the beginning of a 50 meter long street, the person travels 50 meters, steals your wallet and goes back 50 meters to exit the street, this is all happening at Mach 2, what do you think you would you see in this scenario?
 
Mach 2 is 686 meters per second, I think 50 meters would take 7.28 centiseconds. You would observe a total of 15-16 centiseconds. Jeez, I just realized how fast that is. Guess I answered my own question.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K
  • · Replies 65 ·
3
Replies
65
Views
12K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 48 ·
2
Replies
48
Views
8K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K