If energy cannot be created or destroyed, what is the universe?

  • Thread starter Thread starter MathJakob
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy Universe
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the implications of the conservation of energy law in relation to the universe's existence and the Big Bang. It raises questions about whether energy has always existed, suggesting that if energy cannot be created or destroyed, then the universe may have always existed in some form. The Big Bang Theory describes the universe's expansion from a hot, dense state but does not explain its origin, leaving the question of how energy came into existence unanswered. Additionally, it is noted that conservation laws may not apply in curved spacetime, complicating the understanding of energy in the context of the universe's formation. Overall, the conversation highlights the ongoing uncertainty and exploration in cosmology regarding the universe's origins and the nature of energy.
MathJakob
Messages
161
Reaction score
5
I really hope this isn't another stupid question but I think it's a valid question so i'll ask it.

If the conservation of energy law states that energy cannot be created or destroyed, then why did it come into existence when the big bang happened? Could we not assume that the energy that created the big bang is also the universe itself? So basically if the 1st law of thermodynamics is true, does that not state that energy has always existed in one form or another?

So if that second statement is true, we can say that the universe has always existed in one form or another and thus was never created, because it always existed, and if it always existed, that supports the 1st law of thermodyamics?

/confused.
 
Space news on Phys.org
We do not know how the universe came into existence. The Big Bang Theory does NOT deal with the origin of the universe. It simply states that the universe was once in a very hot, very dense state and expanded and cooled from there over time, eventually leading to the universe as we see it today. So your question cannot be answered with any certainty.
 
Hope blooms eternal. We still hold hope some questions will be clarified by CMB polarization measurements, LIGO, JWST and a number of other efforts still underway. We have made remarkable progress over the past decade.
 
MathJakob said:
I really hope this isn't another stupid question but I think it's a valid question so i'll ask it.

If the conservation of energy law states that energy cannot be created or destroyed, then why did it come into existence when the big bang happened? Could we not assume that the energy that created the big bang is also the universe itself? So basically if the 1st law of thermodynamics is true, does that not state that energy has always existed in one form or another?

So if that second statement is true, we can say that the universe has always existed in one form or another and thus was never created, because it always existed, and if it always existed, that supports the 1st law of thermodyamics?

/confused.
Conservation of energy doesn't apply in a curved space-time in general. See here for an in-depth discussion:
http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Relativity/GR/energy_gr.html
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
The formal paper is here. The Rutgers University news has published a story about an image being closely examined at their New Brunswick campus. Here is an excerpt: Computer modeling of the gravitational lens by Keeton and Eid showed that the four visible foreground galaxies causing the gravitational bending couldn’t explain the details of the five-image pattern. Only with the addition of a large, invisible mass, in this case, a dark matter halo, could the model match the observations...
Hi, I’m pretty new to cosmology and I’m trying to get my head around the Big Bang and the potential infinite extent of the universe as a whole. There’s lots of misleading info out there but this forum and a few others have helped me and I just wanted to check I have the right idea. The Big Bang was the creation of space and time. At this instant t=0 space was infinite in size but the scale factor was zero. I’m picturing it (hopefully correctly) like an excel spreadsheet with infinite...
Back
Top