If f is meromorphic on U with only a finite number of poles, then

  • Thread starter Thread starter fauboca
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Finite Poles
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the properties of meromorphic functions defined on a domain U, particularly focusing on the representation of such functions as quotients of analytic functions when they possess a finite number of poles. Participants explore the implications of having poles and the conditions under which a meromorphic function can be expressed in a specific form.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the representation of a meromorphic function as a quotient of two holomorphic functions, questioning how this holds true when considering the number of poles. There are inquiries about the case of a single pole and the implications of the order of singularities.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants raising specific scenarios regarding the number of poles and the nature of the functions involved. Some have suggested that if there is only one pole, the function can be expressed in a simplified form, while others emphasize the need for careful consideration of the analytic properties of the functions involved.

Contextual Notes

There is an ongoing examination of the definitions and properties of poles and singularities, with participants noting the importance of distinguishing between singularities and zeros in the context of the functions being discussed.

fauboca
Messages
157
Reaction score
0
If f is meromorphic on U with only a finite number of poles, then f=\frac{g}{h} where g and h are analytic on U.

We say f is meromorphic, then f is defined on U except at discrete set of points S which are poles. If z_0 is such a point, then there exist m in integers such that (z-z_0)^mf(z) is holomorphic in a neighborhood of z_0.

A pole is \lim_{z\to a}|f(z)| =\infty.

S0 the trouble is showing that f is the quotient of two holomorphic functions.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


How would you show it if there is only one pole?
 


Dick said:
How would you show it if there is only one pole?

If the pole is at z_0, then

f=\frac{g}{(z-z_0)}

Let S be the set of the poles of f in U and let h be analytic in U with singularities at the points in S. Let the order of the singularity be the order of the pole in f. Then fh has only removable singularities in U.

fh=g\Rightarrow f=\frac{g}{h}
 
Last edited:


fauboca said:
If the pole is at z_0, then

f=\frac{g}{(z-z_0)}

Let S be the set of the poles of f in U and let h be analytic in U with singularities at the points in S. Let the order of the singularity be the order of the pole in f. Then fh has only removable singularities in U.

fh=g\Rightarrow f=\frac{g}{h}

You want h to have 'zeroes', not 'singularities'.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K