If g is diff'able at x_0, g(x) <= mx + b, show g'(x_0) = m

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter rayge
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on proving that if a function g is differentiable at a point x_0 and satisfies the conditions g(x_0) = mx_0 + b and g(x) ≥ mx + b for all x, then the derivative g'(x_0) equals m. The participants explore the limitations of applying the intermediate value theorem, extreme value theorem, and mean value theorem due to the lack of intervals. A suggestion is made to utilize Fermat's theorem creatively to establish the proof.

PREREQUISITES
  • Differentiability of functions
  • Understanding of linear functions (mx + b)
  • Fermat's theorem in calculus
  • Basic knowledge of theorems in real analysis
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of Fermat's theorem in calculus proofs
  • Explore the implications of differentiability on function behavior
  • Learn about the mean value theorem and its conditions
  • Investigate the properties of linear approximations of functions
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, calculus instructors, and anyone interested in advanced calculus concepts and proofs related to differentiability and function behavior.

rayge
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
Pretty much as in the title, except one major condition: g(x_0) = m*x_0 + b.

So, conditions are:
g defined on the reals and is differentiable at x_0.
g(x_0) = m*x_0 + b
mx + b <= g(x) for all x

Then show m = g'(x_0)

I would love to use the intermediate value theorem, or extreme value theorem, or mean value theorem, but since we can only say g is differentiable at x_0 those can't apply since we don't have any intervals where those theorems would apply. Just wondering if there's an obvious theorem to apply here. Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In the event that ##g'(x_0)=m##, then ##y=mx_0+b## is the equation of the line tangent to the graph of ##g## at the point ##(x_0,g(x_0))##.

That's a hint. You should verify that it's true. The hint is not part of a proof, but rather a nudge in the direction of an idea that might lead to a proof.

Edit: There is also a slick way to get this done using Fermat's theorem if you're clever enough to find the right function to use it on.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 65 ·
3
Replies
65
Views
9K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 71 ·
3
Replies
71
Views
4K