If it takes me 60 seconds to make a cup of tea, and my manager wants

  • Thread starter Thread starter Qyzren
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Seconds
Qyzren
Messages
41
Reaction score
0
if it takes me 60 seconds to make a cup of tea, and my manager wants me to make it 25% faster, does that mean i make it in
a) 60/1.25 = 48 seconds
b) 60*0.75 = 45 seconds

some people say a, some people say b. What do you guys think?
I think personally think it's a.

If someone told you to make it 100% faster that means make it twice as fast => 30 seconds, if someone told you to make it 200% faster it means 3x as fast as original => 20 seconds. so 25% faster => 48 seconds.

I believe 60 * 0.75 means a reduction by 25% and not faster by 25%...
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org


Boy this is getting really picky! Okay, since the manager (you're really just trying to sass the manager aren't you?) said specifically "25% faster", and "fast" refers to speed, let's look at speed. You can make a cup of tea at 1/60 cup/sec. "25% faster" would mean 1.25*1/60= 1/48 cup/sec. Working "25% faster" means you make the cup of tea in 48 seconds rather than 60 seconds.
 


in colloquial if i do something in x time and later in x/2 time then i did this 2times faster. so here i think we want x/(5/4) by analogy. 5/4 times faster. language is picky if you mean "sooner" when say "faster".
 


Good point. "25% sooner" would be 60- (.25)(60)= 45 seconds while "25% faster" is 48 seconds.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
85
Views
9K
Replies
33
Views
4K
Back
Top