If only I was born a couple hundred years earlier

  • Thread starter Thread starter LogicX
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Couple Years
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the feelings of frustration and reflection regarding originality in ideas, particularly in the context of scientific discoveries and inventions. Participants share personal experiences of realizing that their independent thoughts or inventions have already been conceived by others, leading to a broader contemplation of creativity and historical context in scientific progress.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses a sense of having independently postulated the heat death of the universe, questioning whether they should attribute co-creation of the idea to themselves.
  • Another participant reflects on the nature of intuition in generating ideas, suggesting that some ideas may seem original but are actually intuitive conclusions based on existing knowledge.
  • A participant shares a personal sentiment about their ideas being original yet not good, highlighting a tension between originality and quality.
  • One participant mentions a specific invention idea that has already been realized, expressing a desire to have lived in a time when fewer inventions existed.
  • Another participant conveys a sense of resignation about their inventive attempts, noting that they often find their ideas have either been previously discovered or contain significant flaws.
  • A participant discusses the phenomenon of simultaneous discoveries, suggesting that once foundational discoveries are made, the implications become apparent to others with access to the same knowledge base.
  • There is a sentiment that the answers to scientific questions are often presented in a clear manner after the initial discoveries, which may diminish the sense of originality for subsequent thinkers.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a shared sense of frustration regarding originality in ideas, but there is no consensus on the implications of this frustration or the nature of creativity itself. Multiple competing views on the relationship between originality and intuition are present.

Contextual Notes

Participants' reflections are based on personal experiences and subjective interpretations of creativity and invention, which may not account for broader historical or scientific contexts.

LogicX
Messages
175
Reaction score
1
When I was in high school and first learned about the laws of thermodynamics, I independently postulated the heat death of the universe (of course I didn't know it was called that at the time).

A few years later and I find out that some guys in the 1800s beat me to it.

What do you think, should I go amend the wikipedia article to attribute co-creation of this idea to myself? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heat_death_of_the_universe
 
Physics news on Phys.org
LogicX said:
When I was in high school and first learned about the laws of thermodynamics, I independently postulated the heat death of the universe (of course I didn't know it was called that at the time).

A few years later and I find out that some guys in the 1800s beat me to it.

What do you think, should I go amend the wikipedia article to attribute co-creation of this idea to myself? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heat_death_of_the_universe

Isn't that just intuition?
 
I have the same problem. My ideas are good and original. Unfortunately the original ones aren't good and the good ones aren't original.
 
I had an idea for a tooth brush with the toothpaste tube attached and you squeeze it and the toothpaste comes up through the bristles. Already done.

I go through this in math sometimes. I do so wish I lived back before all the easy stuff was already invented/discovered.
 
No, all you get is self-satisfaction, sorry.
 
I gave up trying to invent stuff. Every idea I've ever had someone has either beat me to it or there was a serious flaw in my idea, enough to scrap the idea.

That's not to say I haven't done a good job of coming up with quick and dirty mechanical solutions on the fly. I wouldn't call them inventions, though. Just quick, temporary fixes.

I'm afraid if I'd been born 200 years earlier, I'd more than likely have spent most of that life staring at the back end of a plow horse.
 
the problem is, once the underlying discoveries are made, the implications are often obvious. i think this is why you so often get simultaneous discoveries of the same science independently. those independents have access to the same knowledge base, and the results are obvious to both.

the answer was actually handed to you, in a nice tidy package.
 

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 57 ·
2
Replies
57
Views
8K
Replies
5
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
25K