If sound moves faster through ?

  • Thread starter Thread starter neoweb
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sound
AI Thread Summary
Sound travels faster through dense materials like glass, wood, and metal compared to air, but barriers like glass can quieten sound due to absorption and reflection of sound waves. When sound waves encounter a barrier, some are absorbed, leading to a reduction in sound intensity. Additionally, sound waves may reflect off the barrier, preventing some from reaching the listener. This phenomenon is particularly noticeable in environments like cars, where the entire structure vibrates, further dissipating sound energy. Thus, while sound moves quickly through dense materials, barriers can effectively dampen sound levels.
neoweb
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
If sound moves faster (better?) through dense materials such as wood or metal as compared to air (over ten times quicker through glass i believe) then what's the "scientific" explanation for why putting a sheet of glass or some other barrier between you and the speaker ends up quietening the sound down?

Is it because the glass or whatever is "absorbing" some or a lot of the sound waves? How is this reconciled with the fact that it is also moving faster?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
neoweb said:
If sound moves faster (better?) through dense materials such as wood or metal as compared to air (over ten times quicker through glass i believe) then what's the "scientific" explanation for why putting a sheet of glass or some other barrier between you and the speaker ends up quietening the sound down?

Is it because the glass or whatever is "absorbing" some or a lot of the sound waves? How is this reconciled with the fact that it is also moving faster?

The sound waves don't transfer between materials such as air and wood easily. Some of the waves will get bounced back by the wood. (echo...)
 
neoweb said:
If sound moves faster (better?) through dense materials such as wood or metal as compared to air (over ten times quicker through glass i believe) then what's the "scientific" explanation for why putting a sheet of glass or some other barrier between you and the speaker ends up quietening the sound down?

Is it because the glass or whatever is "absorbing" some or a lot of the sound waves? How is this reconciled with the fact that it is also moving faster?

youve answered your ovn question. It is the absorbtion which dies out the sound. When you put glass in front of a speaker (in a car) notice how the whole car vibrates and the sound energy just goes to the vibration of the car. Another reason is the one stated above but this only works partially.
 
reflection. some get through, but most don't.

if the sound sorce and the receptor are within the same solid medium, this reflection won't happen.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top