Is There an Infinite Number of Galaxies in an Infinite Universe?

  • Thread starter Thread starter alexsok
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Infinite Universe
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on whether an infinite universe implies an infinite number of galaxies and stars. It acknowledges that while we can only observe a limited portion of the universe, estimates of the total number of stars and galaxies are based on our observable slice. The conversation questions the validity of claims about the universe's total star count and age, suggesting they may be vacuous without considering the unobservable regions. The age of the universe is determined by factors like the temperature of the microwave background and the expansion rate, rather than just observational limits. The Cosmological principle is highlighted as a foundational assumption that supports the uniformity of the universe across vast distances.
alexsok
Messages
123
Reaction score
0
If the universe is infinite (and BB theory can work with infinite and finite space equally well), then does that mean that there is an infinite number of galaxies with an infinite number of stars?

I know we can only observe our slice of the universe that the light had time to reach us and that the universe is estimated to be 13.5 billion (or 150 billion which i saw somewhere else) years old but let's assume that the universe is finite with no boundary and it's expanding, then isn't the best thing we can do is give an ESTIMATE of how many stars and galaxies there are in the universe and how old it is based on our observable slice and keep updating the data as our instruments get stronger?

Does that make claims such as "the universe has x amount of stars and x amount of galaxies" and "the universe is x years old" vacuous? How can we put limits on our observable piece of the universe without mentioning that perhaps on the unobservable plane there is an infinity of the same matter or at the very least, an infinity of black space with no galaxies?
 
Last edited:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
The age of the universe is not based on how far we can look. The temperature of the microwave background as well as the universe expansion rate lead to the 13.7 billion year age.
 
In order for observations to have meaning, astronomers have adopted the Cosmological principle which states that, when taken on a large enough scale, the universe is homogenous and isotropic. This means that we assume that the universe looks basically the same to all viewers regardless of position. So someone sitting 46.5 billion light years away at the edge of the observable universe should see (at this exact moment) an observable universe that appears 13.7 billion years old and 93 billion light years across.
 
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Asteroid, Data - 1.2% risk of an impact on December 22, 2032. The estimated diameter is 55 m and an impact would likely release an energy of 8 megatons of TNT equivalent, although these numbers have a large uncertainty - it could also be 1 or 100 megatons. Currently the object has level 3 on the Torino scale, the second-highest ever (after Apophis) and only the third object to exceed level 1. Most likely it will miss, and if it hits then most likely it'll hit an ocean and be harmless, but...

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
40
Views
6K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
25
Views
4K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
1K
Back
Top