If the world is composed, at least partially of, particles

  • Thread starter Thread starter yinyinwang
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Particles
yinyinwang
Particles
If the world is composed, at least partially of, particles, what makes them so similar? Like the buttons produced from the same mould. Electrons are all the same? Do they change a little bit in shape or structure?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
The differences between subatomic particles are known as its quantum numbers... Such as flavors, and colors...
 
If you assume, like deBroglie did, that the electron is a real particle, this particle has an internal oscillation which causes the wave around it, you will not find an experiment, which contradicts this assumption.

Take the above quote from another forum together with the reply from quantum

The differences between subatomic particles are known as its quantum numbers... Such as flavors, and colors...

and look for the simplest arrangement that satisfies both assumptions. Current thinking uses four forces and mass, my own proposal is for a single force and a force carrier.
Because the numbers are the same for both arrangements, both are plausable; as would be any other proposal that matches both statements. The great problem lies in devising an experiment that proves one particular proposal to be correct.
My proposal does somethings that the four force model cannot do in that it offers a solution to the Galaxy gravity problem and shows a link between the wave structure of particles and larger bodies. However it is only right to point out that they have not received favourable comments from forum members so its back to the drawing board to try and find a better way of presenting my case.
Meanwhile the answer to your question is that there is no confirmed answer.
 
What i am trying to say is that the particles were produced as if by some standard production process to make them so similar. Is nature capable of such process?

The structure or shape of a particle is the basic mechanism of particles, not what they contain, like a cup, what a cup contain has nothing to do with the shape of the cup, even though what a cup contain often appear along with the cup.
 
Thread 'Why is there such a difference between the total cross-section data? (simulation vs. experiment)'
Well, I'm simulating a neutron-proton scattering phase shift. The equation that I solve numerically is the Phase function method and is $$ \frac{d}{dr}[\delta_{i+1}] = \frac{2\mu}{\hbar^2}\frac{V(r)}{k^2}\sin(kr + \delta_i)$$ ##\delta_i## is the phase shift for triplet and singlet state, ##\mu## is the reduced mass for neutron-proton, ##k=\sqrt{2\mu E_{cm}/\hbar^2}## is the wave number and ##V(r)## is the potential of interaction like Yukawa, Wood-Saxon, Square well potential, etc. I first...
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top