If you cut a magnet in two, why do you get two magnets?

AI Thread Summary
Cutting a magnet in two results in two smaller magnets because the magnetization of ferromagnetic materials is due to the alignment of atomic magnetic fields. When a magnet is divided, each half retains the same alignment of magnetic domains, resulting in a north and south pole on each piece. The analogy of cars in a parking lot illustrates this concept: when cars (representing magnetic domains) are aligned in one direction, cutting the lot in half still maintains the directional alignment. This means that both halves exhibit magnetic properties. The discussion clarifies that magnetic polarization differs from electric charge polarization.
VelocityGirl
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Maybe cut isn't the best word, but you get what I mean.

Surely if all the negative polar molecules move to one side of the magnet and the positive polar molecules move to the other side, and you cut the magnet in the middle, you shouldn't get two more magnets?

I'm still only doing high school physics, so the answer might be blindingly obvious.. :shy:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Polar molecules are electric charge polarized not magnetic charge polarized. The magnetization of a ferromagnetic material is due to the small magnetic fields of each atom being aligned in one direction.

Think of the analogy of cars in a parking lot. In a non-magnetic material the cars are turned around randomly. Turn them on and you see an equal number of head-lights and tail-lights from any given direction. Now if you align all the cars then in one direction you only have headlights and in the opposite direction you only have tail lights. Cut the parking lot in half and each half has the same property.
 
jambaugh said:
Polar molecules are electric charge polarized not magnetic charge polarized. The magnetization of a ferromagnetic material is due to the small magnetic fields of each atom being aligned in one direction.

Think of the analogy of cars in a parking lot. In a non-magnetic material the cars are turned around randomly. Turn them on and you see an equal number of head-lights and tail-lights from any given direction. Now if you align all the cars then in one direction you only have headlights and in the opposite direction you only have tail lights. Cut the parking lot in half and each half has the same property.

Oh, that makes sense. Thank you! :biggrin:
 
jambaugh said:
Think of the analogy of cars in a parking lot. In a non-magnetic material the cars are turned around randomly. Turn them on and you see an equal number of head-lights and tail-lights from any given direction. Now if you align all the cars then in one direction you only have headlights and in the opposite direction you only have tail lights. Cut the parking lot in half and each half has the same property.

That is beautiful. Thank you James!
 
Yes, that's great! :!)
 
It may be shown from the equations of electromagnetism, by James Clerk Maxwell in the 1860’s, that the speed of light in the vacuum of free space is related to electric permittivity (ϵ) and magnetic permeability (μ) by the equation: c=1/√( μ ϵ ) . This value is a constant for the vacuum of free space and is independent of the motion of the observer. It was this fact, in part, that led Albert Einstein to Special Relativity.
Back
Top