I'm new to proofs. Would someone please give me an opinion on my proof?

  • Thread starter Thread starter nietzsche
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proof Proofs
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a student's proof that if 0 < a < b, then a < √(ab) < (a + b)/2 < b. The student attempts to use twelve basic properties of numbers provided by their professor but is unsure how to apply them correctly in their proof. Feedback suggests that the student should explicitly indicate which properties support each step, particularly when manipulating inequalities. Additionally, a simpler approach to one part of the proof is recommended, focusing on the non-negativity of squared terms. Overall, the student is encouraged to clarify their use of mathematical properties to strengthen their argument.
nietzsche
Messages
185
Reaction score
0
My prof gave us twelve basic properties of numbers, and I think I'm supposed to use those in my proof, but I'm not sure how to incorporate them.

The properties are:
P1 Associative law for addition
P2 Additive identity
P3 Additive inverse
P4 Commutative law for addition
P5 Associative law for multiplication
P6 Multiplicative identity
P7 Multiplicative inverse
P8 Commutative law for multiplication
P9 Distributive law
P10 Trichotomy law
P11 Closure under addition
P12 Closure under multiplication

Homework Statement



Prove that if 0 < a < b, then

a &lt; \sqrt{ab} &lt; \frac{a + b}{2} &lt; b

Homework Equations



N/A

The Attempt at a Solution



Part I:

<br /> \begin{align*}<br /> a&amp;&lt;b\\<br /> a^2&amp;&lt;ab\\<br /> \sqrt{a^2}&amp;&lt;\sqrt{ab}\\<br /> a&amp;&lt;\sqrt{ab}<br /> \end{align*}<br />

Part II:

<br /> Suppose:<br /> \begin{align*}<br /> \sqrt{ab}&amp;\geq\frac{a+b}{2}\\<br /> ab&amp;\geq\left(\frac{a+b}{2}\right)^2\\<br /> ab&amp;\geq\frac{a^2+2ab+b^2}{4}\\<br /> 4ab&amp;\geq a^2+2ab+b^2\\<br /> 0&amp;\geq a^2-2ab+b^2\\<br /> 0&amp;\geq (a-b)^2\\<br /> \end{align*}<br />

<br /> but:<br /> \begin{align*}<br /> 0&amp;&lt;(a-b)^2\\<br /> \therefore \sqrt{ab}&amp;&lt;\frac{a+b}{2}<br /> \end{align*}<br />

Part III:

<br /> \begin{align*}<br /> a&amp;&lt;b\\<br /> a+b &amp;&lt; b+b\\<br /> a+b &amp;&lt; 2b\\<br /> \frac{a+b}{2} &amp;&lt; b<br /> \end{align*}<br />

So I'm able to prove them, but I don't know if I used the properties correctly (if at all). Any opinions or suggestions?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
nietzsche said:
My prof gave us twelve basic properties of numbers, and I think I'm supposed to use those in my proof, but I'm not sure how to incorporate them.

The properties are:
P1 Associative law for addition
P2 Additive identity
P3 Additive inverse
P4 Commutative law for addition
P5 Associative law for multiplication
P6 Multiplicative identity
P7 Multiplicative inverse
P8 Commutative law for multiplication
P9 Distributive law
P10 Trichotomy law
P11 Closure under addition
P12 Closure under multiplication

Homework Statement



Prove that if 0 < a < b, then

a &lt; \sqrt{ab} &lt; \frac{a + b}{2} &lt; b

Homework Equations



N/A

The Attempt at a Solution



Part I:

<br /> \begin{align*}<br /> a&amp;&lt;b\\<br /> a^2&amp;&lt;ab\\<br /> \sqrt{a^2}&amp;&lt;\sqrt{ab}\\<br /> a&amp;&lt;\sqrt{ab}<br /> \end{align*}<br />
By "using the properties" I think your prof means for you to indicate which property allows you to do each step. However, in some of your steps you are using operations that aren't listed amongst the properties you show. For example, in your 2nd inequality, when you multiply both members of an inequality by a positive number, the direction of the inequality stays the same.
nietzsche said:
Part II:

<br /> Suppose:<br /> \begin{align*}<br /> \sqrt{ab}&amp;\geq\frac{a+b}{2}\\<br /> ab&amp;\geq\left(\frac{a+b}{2}\right)^2\\<br /> ab&amp;\geq\frac{a^2+2ab+b^2}{4}\\<br /> 4ab&amp;\geq a^2+2ab+b^2\\<br /> 0&amp;\geq a^2-2ab+b^2\\<br /> 0&amp;\geq (a-b)^2\\<br /> \end{align*}<br />

<br /> but:<br /> \begin{align*}<br /> 0&amp;&lt;(a-b)^2\\<br /> \therefore \sqrt{ab}&amp;&lt;\frac{a+b}{2}<br /> \end{align*}<br />
For the one above, instead of doing a proof by contradiction, as you have done, it would be simpler to start with (a - b)2 >= 0 (the square of any real number is always nonnegative). Then expand the left side and you should be able to get to the conclusion you need.
nietzsche said:
Part III:

<br /> \begin{align*}<br /> a&amp;&lt;b\\<br /> a+b &amp;&lt; b+b\\<br /> a+b &amp;&lt; 2b\\<br /> \frac{a+b}{2} &amp;&lt; b<br /> \end{align*}<br />

So I'm able to prove them, but I don't know if I used the properties correctly (if at all). Any opinions or suggestions?
In the one above, b + b = b(1 + 1) = b*2 = 2b. The properties used are the distributive property and the commutative property of multiplication.
 
I picked up this problem from the Schaum's series book titled "College Mathematics" by Ayres/Schmidt. It is a solved problem in the book. But what surprised me was that the solution to this problem was given in one line without any explanation. I could, therefore, not understand how the given one-line solution was reached. The one-line solution in the book says: The equation is ##x \cos{\omega} +y \sin{\omega} - 5 = 0##, ##\omega## being the parameter. From my side, the only thing I could...
Back
Top