I'm not sure where to start with very basic cosmology

  • Thread starter Thread starter astralarcher
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cosmology
AI Thread Summary
To begin learning basic cosmology, it's recommended to start with accessible astronomy lectures, such as those by Robert Wagner, which provide a solid foundation without heavy mathematics. After grasping the basics, moving on to more advanced topics can be facilitated by resources like Leonard Susskind's "Modern Physics Cosmology." While calculus and general relativity (GR) are important for deeper understanding, it's noted that cosmology can be appreciated without extensive mathematical knowledge. For those not pursuing a career in cosmology, focusing on conceptual understanding rather than complex equations is advisable. Overall, starting with introductory materials and gradually progressing to more complex subjects is the best approach.
astralarcher
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I understand that to make any sort of equations or mathematics I'll need some calculus and GR but beyond that I'm at a loss. What sort of books should I be picking up as a beginner before I can start touching on other things, such as GR? Is there something I should read before trying to attempt self-teaching differential equations or series expansions? I have no knowledge of where I should begin or where I should be asking this question. Specifics would be very helpful, such as certain books or certain authors I should be looking at. To give you an insight of where I would be starting, I have never had or took any courses in physics whatsoever and I have no idea what a Quantum Theory is. But I'm going insane wanting to learn more.
 
Space news on Phys.org
Hi @astralarcher

Two suggestions for you - both of which I've watched and are excellent

A non-maths (or very basic maths content) set of lectures are available for download in lots of places by Robert Wagner. They are
ATR103 Introduction to Planetary Astronomy
ATR104 Introduction to Stellar Astronomy
Although it's astronomy and cosmology, it will give you a fabulous grounding in the basics and is some of the most accessible content I've ever watched / listened to. I would really recommend starting here before you move onto cosmology

If you then want to move onto the broader subject - with math... Leanord Suskind is one of the greatest tutors (in my opinion anyway!). Google "Modern Physics Cosmology Winter 2013" and download in your preferred format.

Both HACC and Stanford make great lectures available to the public for free
Best Regards
Matt
 
astralarcher said:
I understand that to make any sort of equations or mathematics I'll need some calculus and GR but beyond that I'm at a loss.
If you don't plan to be a cosmologist, there's little reason to try to learn the math of GR and modern cosmology. It's NOT simple and you'd need to go through several years of school to understand anything but the most basic mathematical concepts. Luckily, cosmology can be pretty well understood without getting into all the mathy bits.

Try here: http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/cosmo_01.htm
And here: http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/astronomy/bigbang.html#bigbang
 
Gravity is usually the jumping off point. You start with orbits and build from there.
 
To get started on special relativity, a good book is Takeuchi, An Illustrated Guide to Relativity.
 
  • Like
Likes haushofer
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
The formal paper is here. The Rutgers University news has published a story about an image being closely examined at their New Brunswick campus. Here is an excerpt: Computer modeling of the gravitational lens by Keeton and Eid showed that the four visible foreground galaxies causing the gravitational bending couldn’t explain the details of the five-image pattern. Only with the addition of a large, invisible mass, in this case, a dark matter halo, could the model match the observations...
Hi, I’m pretty new to cosmology and I’m trying to get my head around the Big Bang and the potential infinite extent of the universe as a whole. There’s lots of misleading info out there but this forum and a few others have helped me and I just wanted to check I have the right idea. The Big Bang was the creation of space and time. At this instant t=0 space was infinite in size but the scale factor was zero. I’m picturing it (hopefully correctly) like an excel spreadsheet with infinite...

Similar threads

Back
Top