Imaginary Solutions to Radical Equations

  • Thread starter Thread starter Repetit
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The equation Sqrt(x) + 1 = 0 does not have a solution in the realm of real numbers, as the square root function is defined to yield only positive results. In contrast, the equation x^2 + 1 = 0 lacks real solutions unless the imaginary unit i is introduced. The discussion raises the question of why a similar unit isn't defined for Sqrt(x) + 1 = 0, suggesting it may lack practical utility. When considering complex numbers, the square root function becomes multi-valued, allowing for solutions like -1 as a square root of 1. Ultimately, the conversation clarifies the distinctions between real and complex number definitions in relation to radical equations.
Repetit
Messages
128
Reaction score
2
Does the equation Sqrt(x) + 1 = 0 have a solution? I would say that it doesnt. But the equation x^2 + 1 = 0 doesn't have a solution either, unless you define the imaginary unit i as the solution to the equation.

So why don't one define some unit which is the solution to the equation Sqrt(x) + 1 = 0? Is it simply because it is of no practical use?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
\sqrt{i^{4}} +1 = 0
 
Of course, i4= 1!

Repetit, if you are referring to the square root function as defined for real numbers, then \sqrt{x} is specifically DEFINED as "the positive real number whose square is x". By that definition, it is impossible that \sqrt{x}= -1.

If, however, you are referring to the square root function as defined for complex numbers, where 'multi-valued' functions are allowed, then -1 is one of the two square roots of 1. The only solution to the equation \sqrt{x}= -1 is x= 1.
 
Hmm, I see, that makes sense. Thanks to both of you!
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top