IMAX 3D vs RealD 3D: Worth It for Azy Eye?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mdh321
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    3d
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the experience of watching "Suicide Squad" in IMAX, particularly concerning the use of 3D glasses for individuals with a lazy eye. The consensus is that traditional 3D systems, including IMAX RelD 3D, may not be effective for those with a lazy eye, as these systems rely on input from both eyes to create a 3D effect. It is suggested that the individual might be better off watching a non-3D version of the film, although trying out the 3D experience once could provide clarity on its effectiveness. The conversation concludes with a reminder against solicitation, leading to the closure of the thread.
mdh321
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I know I'm not in the right space for thise, nor smart enough to be here, but iplan on seeing Suicide Squad Friday at IMAX. Icant use those red and green glasses they have because I have a azy eye and the don't work compatibly with each other. I just heard of IMAX RelD 3D and was wondering if it would help, if its worth it, or if I should just sit back and watch the movie like a gentleman. Thanks.
 
Biology news on Phys.org
If I understand what a "lazy eye" is correctly, your brain is ignoring the input from one eye. If so, then I don't think any 3D system would work since they all require that your brain process the input from both eyes to generate a 3D image. I'd save your money and watch a non-3D showing. Of course, you could try it out this once and see how it works for you. Then you'd know for sure.
 
  • Like
Likes Fervent Freyja
This is correct. My good eye sees about 90% of my vision while my bad eye sees about `10%. Thanks for your response. I'm sure Ill enjoy it in regular imax, anyways.
 
Please do not come here and solicit. Posts deleted and thread closed.
 
  • Like
Likes Pepper Mint

Thread 'I need help understanding this quote about recent Natural Selection'

I am reading Nicholas Wade's book A Troublesome Inheritance. Please let's not make this thread a critique about the merits or demerits of the book. This thread is my attempt to understanding the evidence that Natural Selection in the human genome was recent and regional. On Page 103 of A Troublesome Inheritance, Wade writes the following: "The regional nature of selection was first made evident in a genomewide scan undertaken by Jonathan Pritchard, a population geneticist at the...
View full post »

Similar threads

3D Cinema Glasses: An Unsolved Personal Experience
Replies
9
Views
2K
Why Does Ghosting Occur in Polarized 3D Movies?
Replies
2
Views
5K
Mathematica This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 261)
Replies
5
Views
3K
Mathematica This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 257)
Replies
5
Views
4K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top