Impact on glass and consequences of said impact

  • Thread starter Thread starter El Psy Congroo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Glass Impact
AI Thread Summary
A small, smooth pebble can indeed be propelled by a weed-eater at high speeds, potentially causing a clean hole in the windshield without creating a star-like crack, as the impact dynamics depend on the angle and speed of the projectile. The damage observed is likely due to the properties of tempered glass, which can lead to cracks forming easily under residual stress. The distinction between a clean chip and a messy crack may relate to the mass and composition of the pebble, as well as the angle of impact. A lower speed or different angle of impact could result in a more chaotic crack pattern. Understanding these factors can help in assessing windshield damage and its implications for safety.
El Psy Congroo
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello everyone!

I happen to read this forum a lot, but I've never posted/became a member since I didn't have a specific question that wasn't already asked before or because I did not feel I had anything relatively original to contribute. So, I have a question to which I cannot seem to find an answer to and hope that someone with the knowledge can answer it.

So my situation is as follows:

I am driving down a road at about 40 mph when suddenly a small crack on my windshield appeared. The crack then spread to about 6-8 inches within minutes. Someone was cutting the grass using an edge trimmer on the sidewalk where I drove by.

I would like to know if it is possible for a small, smooth pebble/rock to be propelled from the ground with the weed-eater at a fast enough speed to make a small, clean hole a few mm in length without having a star-like-crack effect on the glass, and only perforating the first glass layer of the windshield? Conversely. if the same rock was flying at much lower speed, would that then cause a messier/star-like crack instead of a clean little hole? Additionally, only the first outer layer of the windshield is damaged.

My take on it, is that it is definitely possible for this to happen, because if you look close enough, the rock seems to have made a bit of an "oscillation/ripple" effect as it was leaving the area of impact in the direction it was heading. I believe the rock came from the right side (from the driver's perspective), and headed off toward the left side (again from the driver's perspective).

What's your take on this situation?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Automotive (safety) glass is a composite material- layers of tempered glass separated by a plastic film. What you observe us likely due to the tempered glass- the residual stress energy means cracks form very easily.
 
El Psy Congroo said:
I would like to know if it is possible for a small, smooth pebble/rock to be propelled from the ground with the weed-eater at a fast enough speed to make a small, clean hole a few mm in length without having a star-like-crack effect on the glass, and only perforating the first glass layer of the windshield?
Definitely, although I would probably call anything that didn't perforate through all the layers a "chip" rather than a "hole".

Regarding whether the initial damage is clean or messy, I am not sure what causes that. I would think that lots of details are involved including the mass and composition of the projectile.
 
I am no expert either, but love to speculate...

...I was going to say that the clean-cut vs star-like scratch probably has to do with the angle of impact or in other words, the component of the velocity perpendicular to the plane of the windshield...if you are driving along the side walk and a pebble is launched by the lawn mower, chances are the impact is going to come from a rather small angle with the pebble almost going by sideways...as opposed to be driving on the highway and hitting a pebble that has been lifted into the air right in front you, this is more of a frontal impact.
 
As expected--good responses guys, gave me a bit to think about. Thank you!
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...

Similar threads

Replies
20
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
2
Replies
52
Views
7K
Replies
25
Views
5K
Replies
13
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
5K
Back
Top