Implications of a "theory of everything"

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Physics Slayer
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Theory of everything
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the differing interpretations of a "theory of everything" (TOE) between the general public and physicists. While the public often associates TOE with existential questions, physicists define it as a theoretical framework that unifies the four fundamental forces of nature. The conversation raises questions about the motivations behind the pursuit of Grand Unified Theories (GUTs), such as superstring theory, and their implications for understanding fundamental issues like the information paradox and baryon asymmetry. Participants emphasize the importance of precise definitions in scientific discourse.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of fundamental forces in physics
  • Familiarity with Grand Unified Theories (GUTs)
  • Basic knowledge of string theory
  • Awareness of scientific terminology and definitions
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the latest developments in Grand Unified Theories (GUTs)
  • Explore the implications of the information paradox in modern physics
  • Study baryon asymmetry and its significance in cosmology
  • Read about different models of the theory of everything (TOE)
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for physicists, students of physics, and anyone interested in the philosophical implications of theoretical physics, particularly those exploring the nature of existence and the universe.

Physics Slayer
Messages
26
Reaction score
8
I think normal people and physicists have different definitions of a "theory of everything", normal people (I am not calling Physicists abnormal although some of dem are a bit wonky) usually mean something along the lines of meaning of life/why we exist/ purpose in life etc.
Physicists on the other hand refer to a theoretical framework that unites all four fundamental forces of nature, at it's face value this doesn't sound very grandiose(to a normal person atleast) and definitely doesn't sound like something worthy of the title of "theory of everything". Do physicists glorify these theories (eg:super string theory) only because of their mathematical elegance(or because they want funding👀) or are there other deeper consequences of having a GUT?(like answering some other fundamental questions of the universe, something like the information paradox or Baryon asymmetry etc.)

I haven't studied string theory or any other GUT, heck I'm till solving block on incline problems but I'm curious about the latest developments in physics.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Physics Slayer said:
I think normal people and physicists have different definitions of a "theory of everything", normal people (I am not calling Physicists abnormal although some of dem are a bit wonky) usually mean something along the lines of meaning of life/why we exist/ purpose in life etc.
That would be an error of the word 'theory' made by these 'normal people'.

A theory has a specific meaning - and its not about answering 'why' questions or attributing 'meaning'.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: russ_watters
Physics Slayer said:
I think normal people and physicists
Excuse me?
Are you trying to be insulting?
 
  • Skeptical
Likes   Reactions: Physics Slayer
Physics Slayer said:
I am not calling Physicists abnormal although some of dem are a bit wonky
That's exactly what you are doing!
 
The PC expression for physicists is differently normal, although most will accept being called 'special'.
 
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: russ_watters
Thread is locked for Moderation..
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: dlgoff
Thread will remain locked for numerous PF rules violations by the OP.

Physics Slayer said:
or are there other deeper consequences of having a GUT?(like answering some other fundamental questions of the universe, something like the information paradox or Baryon asymmetry etc.)

If you really want to learn more about the various TOE models and current status, do some reading at reliable websites. Then, if you have questions about that reading, start a new thread in the appropriate technical forum (using the B=Basic thread prefix), post links to your reading, and ask *specific* questions about that reading. Have a nice day.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Vanadium 50

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
5K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
8K
  • · Replies 48 ·
2
Replies
48
Views
15K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K