Implicit differentiation and optimization

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves optimizing the dimensions of a conical tent that must contain a specific volume of 40π ft³ while minimizing the total surface area, including the floor. The discussion centers around the application of implicit differentiation and optimization techniques in calculus.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the use of implicit differentiation to relate height and radius, and the setting of the derivative of the surface area with respect to height to zero to find extrema. There is uncertainty about manipulating the resulting equations to express one variable in terms of the other.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on the need to express the surface area as a function of a single variable by substituting one variable into the surface area formula. Others have pointed out the importance of treating radius as a function of height in the differentiation process. The discussion is ongoing, with attempts to clarify the steps needed to reach a solution.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of needing to consider the total differential and the relationship between height and radius as defined by the volume constraint. Participants are exploring the implications of these relationships on the optimization process.

Strants
Messages
52
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement



A conical tent must contain 40\pi ft^{3}. Compute the height and radius of the tent with minimal total surface area. (Include the floor material.)

Homework Equations


1. \frac{\pi r^{2} h}{3} = 40\pi
2. \pi r \sqrt{r^{2} + h^{2}} + \pi r^{2} = S
3. \frac {dr}{dh} = - \frac {r}{2h}
4. \frac {dS} {dh} = \frac {2h^{2} - r^{2}}{2h\sqrt{r^{2} + h^{2}}} - \frac {r^{2}} {h}

The Attempt at a Solution


I used implicit differentiation with respect to h in equation 1 to get equation 3. I then used implicit differentiation and substitution of equation 3 to get equation 4. Because I am looking for an extrema, I then set \frac {dS}{dh} equal to zero and re-arrange to get:

\frac {r^{2}} {h} = \frac {2h^{2} - r^{2}}{2h\sqrt{r^{2} + h^{2}}}

After this, though, I'm not sure how to manipulate equation 5 to get one variable in terms of the other. My book gives the answers h =4\sqrt [3]{15} ft, r = \sqrt{2}\sqrt[3]{15}, which could well be correct, but I'm unclear as to how the answer was derived.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Strants said:

Homework Statement



A conical tent must contain 40\pi ft^{3}. Compute the height and radius of the tent with minimal total surface area. (Include the floor material.)

Homework Equations


1. \frac{\pi r^{2} h}{3} = 40\pi
2. \pi r \sqrt{r^{2} + h^{2}} + \pi r^{2} = S
3. \frac {dr}{dh} = - \frac {r}{2h}
4. \frac {dS} {dh} = \frac {2h^{2} - r^{2}}{2h\sqrt{r^{2} + h^{2}}} - \frac {r^{2}} {h}

The Attempt at a Solution


I used implicit differentiation with respect to h in equation 1 to get equation 3. I then used implicit differentiation and substitution of equation 3 to get equation 4. Because I am looking for an extrema, I then set \frac {dS}{dh} equal to zero and re-arrange to get:

\frac {r^{2}} {h} = \frac {2h^{2} - r^{2}}{2h\sqrt{r^{2} + h^{2}}}

After this, though, I'm not sure how to manipulate equation 5 to get one variable in terms of the other. My book gives the answers h =4\sqrt [3]{15} ft, r = \sqrt{2}\sqrt[3]{15}, which could well be correct, but I'm unclear as to how the answer was derived.
Setting dS/dh= 0 is not enough. It has to be the "total differential" that is equal to 0. Yes,
S(h,r)= \pi r \sqrt{r^{2} + h^{2}} + \pi r^{2}.

And, since
\frac{\pi r^{2} h}{3} = 40\pi

h= 120/r^2. replace h in the surface area formula, so that S is a function of r only, differentiate that with respect to r, and set equal to 0.
 
Strants said:

2. \pi r \sqrt{r^{2} + h^{2}} + \pi r^{2} = S
3. \frac {dr}{dh} = - \frac {r}{2h}
4. \frac {dS} {dh} = \frac {2h^{2} - r^{2}}{2h\sqrt{r^{2} + h^{2}}} - \frac {r^{2}} {h}



In 4 you must remember that r is a function of h so you can't treat it as constant. For example, the derivative of r2 would be 2rdr/dh etc. You will need to substitute for your dr/dh from 3.
 
OK, thanks. I think I understand now.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K