Improper Integrals, Infinite Limits

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around evaluating the improper integral ∫e^(-Sx)sin(ax) dx from 0 to ∞. After applying integration by parts twice, the user arrives at an expression involving a limit as c approaches infinity. The challenge lies in handling the limit of the periodic function sin(ax), which is bounded between -1 and 1, while the exponential term e^(-Sx) approaches zero as x increases. The user concludes that the limit simplifies to -(S^2)/(S(S^2 + a^2)), seeking confirmation of this result. The key takeaway is the interaction between the bounded nature of sin(ax) and the diminishing exponential function in the limit.
Magnawolf
Messages
25
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



∫e-Sxsin(ax) dx, S and A are constants, upper limit is ∞ lower is 0

Homework Equations



∫ u dv = uv - ∫ vdu

The Attempt at a Solution



After integrating by parts twice I got:

(S2)/S(S2+a2) lim c→∞ [-sin(ax)e-Sx + acos(ax)e-Sx] |^{C}_{0}

Okay, now how on Earth do I take the lim c→∞ if sin(ax) is periodic? Since limx→∞ e^-x=0 would it just be (S2)/S(S2+a2) [(0+0) - (0+1)] which becomes
-(S2)/S(S2+a2)?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Magnawolf said:

Homework Statement



∫e-Sxsin(ax) dx, S and A are constants, upper limit is ∞ lower is 0

Homework Equations



∫ u dv = uv - ∫ vdu

The Attempt at a Solution



After integrating by parts twice I got:

(S2)/S(S2+a2) lim c→∞ [-sin(ax)e-Sx + acos(ax)e-Sx] |^{C}_{0}

Okay, now how on Earth do I take the lim c→∞ if sin(ax) is periodic?
sin(ax) is bounded.

-1 ≤ sin(ax) ≤ 1
 
Yeah I know but how do you take the limit of something that's bounded by two numbers? I'm assuming you can't. What I got was that since limx→∞ e^-x=0 would it just be (S2)/S(S2+a2) [(0+0) - (0+1)]? which becomes -(S2)/S(S2+a2). I just want to verify that this is the answer.
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
11K