Improve Phone Antenna Design: Don't Buy from Shaosan Li

AI Thread Summary
Buying a cheap phone from Shaosan Li on eBay resulted in poor reception, only functioning well outdoors and minimally indoors. A user modified the internal antenna with insulated copper wire, improving performance slightly but still seeking better solutions. Recommendations include calculating the optimal antenna length based on frequency, with a formula provided for a quarter wavelength. While modifications may yield some improvement, they are considered a last resort. Users are advised to contact the seller for a return or escalate the issue with eBay to avoid negative feedback.
chr15
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I made the mistake of buying a cheap Chinese phone on Ebay
(don't buy phones from Shaosan Li)
The reception was useless and in only worked in direct line of sight of a phone tower less than 50 m away.
With nothing to lose I pulled the back off the phone and located the internal antenna, and using the battery I jammed a loop of insulated copper wire against it.
It now works a little better - Great outdoors but only sms indoors.
Is there someone here that can save me weeks of trial and error and tell me the
optimal length / thickness / material I should use to improve reception even more ?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Contact the seller and negotiate a return of the phone. If not, contact EBay. These sellers really don't want negative reports on EBay.


If you really have to modify the phone, you can calculate the length of a quarter wavelength of antenna as follows:

L = 75 / F

Where F is the frequency. If F is 2400 MHz, the length would be 75 / 2400 meters or 3.125 cm.

Strictly, it should be a little bit shorter than this, but if you cut a piece of wire to this length, it might be worth a try. You would have to solder it to where the existing antenna joins on.

This might do some good, but it is only a last ditch approach. It probably won't work.
 
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...
Back
Top