Classical Improving my problem solving skills....

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the value of focusing on classical mechanics problem-solving versus exploring more modern physics topics like quantum mechanics and general relativity. The individual, having completed their fourth year of a physics degree, expresses a desire to enhance their practical problem-solving skills by working through problems in David Morin's Classical Mechanics textbook. They question whether the skills gained from classical mechanics are transferable to modern physics. A response highlights that many classical mathematical techniques are foundational for quantum mechanics and general relativity, emphasizing the importance of mastering classical mechanics as a precursor to understanding more advanced topics. This suggests that the skills developed in classical mechanics can indeed be beneficial for tackling modern physics challenges.
MadAtom
Messages
37
Reaction score
0
Hi everybody!

I've just finished my 4th year of physics degree (1st year of the masters degree, to be more exact) and I feel that I've spent most of my time reading theory and studying proofs and very few time on actual problem solving. In order to change that, I decided this summer go through all of David Morin Classical Mechanics textbook problems.

The problems are fine and I am having a lot of fun working on them, but I wonder if I shouldn't instead improve my problem solving on more "modern" topics such as quantum mechanics and general relativity. Let me remind you that I've already had classical mechanics courses (2 actually), and I am only looking to get more comfortable with problems. Are the skills that I am going get from classical mechanics problems really... useful, transferable in some way? I am almost convinced that the answer is yes (I have a very romantic opinion about CM) but I'd like to ear what you think. Thanks in advance.

MA
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Of course, many classical mathematics techniques have migrated into QM and GR. That’s why they taught the Lagrangian and then the Hamiltonian techniques as a precursor to learning QM.
 
For the following four books, has anyone used them in a course or for self study? Compiler Construction Principles and Practice 1st Edition by Kenneth C Louden Programming Languages Principles and Practices 3rd Edition by Kenneth C Louden, and Kenneth A Lambert Programming Languages 2nd Edition by Allen B Tucker, Robert E Noonan Concepts of Programming Languages 9th Edition by Robert W Sebesta If yes to either, can you share your opinions about your personal experience using them. I...
Hi, I have notice that Ashcroft, Mermin and Wei worked at a revised edition of the original solid state physics book (here). The book, however, seems to be never available. I have also read that the reason is related to some disputes related to copyright. Do you have any further information about it? Did you have the opportunity to get your hands on this revised edition? I am really curious about it, also considering that I am planning to buy the book in the near future... Thanks!

Similar threads

Back
Top