Finding Angular Velocity and Center of Mass Velocity for a Free Rotating Rod

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the angular velocity (ω) and the velocity of the center of mass (v0) for a free rotating rod subjected to an impulse (J). The moment of inertia for the rod is defined as I = m l² / 12, leading to the equation ω = (12 d J) / (m l²). The velocity of the center of mass is derived using the impulse-momentum theorem, resulting in v0 = J / m, confirming that this velocity is independent of the point of impulse application.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of angular momentum and impulse-momentum theorem
  • Familiarity with moment of inertia calculations for rigid bodies
  • Knowledge of basic physics concepts related to rotational motion
  • Ability to manipulate equations involving linear and angular quantities
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the impulse-momentum theorem in detail
  • Explore advanced applications of moment of inertia in complex systems
  • Learn about the effects of torque on rotational dynamics
  • Investigate the relationship between linear and angular velocities in various mechanical systems
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, mechanical engineers, and anyone interested in the dynamics of rotating bodies and impulse effects in mechanics.

physicsisgreat
Messages
10
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


I have a rod of mass m and length l on a table without any kind of friction. I give it an impulse J in any point of distance d from the center of the rod, parallel to the table and perpendicular to the rod.
Find the angular velocity ω and the velocity of the center of mass v0.

Homework Equations


Moment of inertia of the rod rotating around its center: I = m l2 / 12
L = I · ω

The Attempt at a Solution


From the impulse theorem:
J = ΔP = P'
I can calculate ω from the angular momentum relations:
L = d x J = I · ω
ω = d J / I = 12 d J / (m l2),
which is 0 if I hit the rod on its center and max if I hit it on d = l/2.
Now I fail to calculate v0 :P

Thank you in advance :)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello P.i.G., welcome to PF :)

Your relevant equation needs one or two colleagues: currently v0 doesn't feature there, ##\omega## doesn't, etc.

Your relevant equation also needs improvement. There is a factor missing.
 
Should you not apply a couple of equal torques (one clock and one anti-clock) to stop any motion of the centre of mass?
 
dean barry said:
Should you not apply a couple of equal torques (one clock and one anti-clock) to stop any motion of the centre of mass?
Not a good idea. 1. It doesn't work. 2. There is nothing that can be considered a cause for these ##\tau##. 3. The center of mass is not "stopped"
 
Hi, I edited my post adding the factor missing and an equation about ω (which I actually used later in my attempt at a solution).
I cannot give another equation about v0 though, as it is exactly what I am looking for! :)
 
Last edited:
Mmh, following the impulse-momentum theorem
J = ΔP
I would say that
v0 = J / m.

At the same time I wonder: can this be true? Can the velocity of the center of mass of the rod be independent from the point in which the impulse is applied?
 
physicsisgreat said:
Mmh, following the impulse-momentum theorem
J = ΔP
I would say that
v0 = J / m.

At the same time I wonder: can this be true? Can the velocity of the center of mass of the rod be independent from the point in which the impulse is applied?
Yes, it's correct. It feels wrong, until you realize that to impart the same impulse further from the centre of mass of the rod you have to 'work' harder. The rod tends to swing out of the way, so takes less momentum off the impacting object. To achieve the same imparted momentum the impacting object has to start with more momentum.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: physicsisgreat
Thank you very much haruspex! :)
 

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 71 ·
3
Replies
71
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
864
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 62 ·
3
Replies
62
Views
13K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
1K
Replies
38
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K