In bcc lattice why XRD 100 peak is not observed ?

hkazmi25
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Can someone tell me that in bcc lattice why xrd 100 peak does not appear?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The planes passing through the base atoms are a/2 away from the planes passing through the planes defined by the atoms on the edge of the cell. And is only a shifted copy of the latter. Hence it will reflect x rays exactly as does one of the edge planes and you get destructive interference.
 
If you calculate the structure factor of the BCC lattice using:
$$S(hkl)=f{1+exp[-i\pi(h+k+l)]}$$, where f= form factor. The value o f S is zero when the exponential has the value -1, which is whenever the argument is: -i*pi* (odd integer).
So we have:
S=0 when h+k+l= odd integer
S=2f when h+k+l= even integer
So therefore the diffraction pattern does not contain these planes: (100), (300), (111), (221)
But it occurs for fx.: (200), (110), (222)

The (100) reflection occurs when reflections from the planes that bound the cubic cell differ in phase by 2*pi. In BCC there is an intervening plane of atoms, which is equal to in scattering power to the other planes. Situated between them it gives a reflection retarded in phase by pi w.r.t. the first plane, thereby cancelling the contribution from that plane. So the cancellation occurs since the planes are identical in composition.
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top