In string theory, what are the small strings physically made out of?

AZcristian623
Messages
4
Reaction score
1
In string theory, what are the small strings physically made out of?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In the standard model, what are the point particles physically made out of?
(Answer: Nothing)

It's an axiom of the theory, not meant to be explained.
 
Aren't they supposed to be 'energy'?

I wouldn't bother trying to understand anything about string theory. It's a bunch of mathematical hokum.
 
AZcristian623 said:
In string theory, what are the small strings physically made out of?
In string theory, they are fundamental, i.e. not made of anything else. Some other theory might say that they're made of something else, but if you knew of such a theory, you would be asking a similar question about that one instead.
 
It should be highly stressed that what is presented in popular science accounts (Brian Greene or what have you) is a series of vague pictures and analogies intended to convey EXCITEMENT, not understanding. String theory is a deeply mathematical theory and any intuition you might have about a CGI image of a vibrating string will be completely incorrect. There are no "strings" in string theory, at least in any way that you can have an intuition about from every day life. I know very little about string theory, however, my understanding is that the central mathematical extension to the standard model is instead of taking particles to be infinitely small 0-dimensional point one instead attaches a single degree of freedom to them, this degree of freedom is the "string". It's not actually a "thing" like a real string, it's just colorful language (and CGI artists looking for a *wow* special effect with no understanding), the "string" is essentially an additional freedom of motion/physics attached to each point in the universe.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Back
Top