Incorporating 3 Forces Into Relativity: Is It Possible?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jonnyb42
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Continuous Model
Jonnyb42
Messages
185
Reaction score
0
Has it been considered to instead of quantizing gravity, and incorporating gravity into the quantum theory, but rather incorporating the other three forces into relativity?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
All of the other forces namely, The Strong Nuclear force and Electroweak force are quantized into and described by Quantum Field Theories: SU(3)xSU(2)xU(1) (The Standard Model). A Quantum Field Theory is a combination of Quantum Mechanics and Special Relativity. Regardless of that point quantizing gravity is necessary to understand the fundamental ideas of the Universe such as where the Universe came from and Planck Scale Physics in which the Energy Levels require that gravity be incorporated. Your approach doesn't address those ideas which are necessary.
 
Last edited:
There's this paper, 'Quantizing Geometry or Geometrizing the Quantum?', which follows an approach somewhat along these lines: http://arxiv.org/abs/1004.2879
 
Kevin_Axion said:
Regardless of that point quantizing gravity is necessary to understand the fundamental ideas of the Universe such as where the Universe came from and Planck Scale Physics in which the Energy Levels require that gravity be incorporated. Your approach doesn't address those ideas which are necessary.

Why is quantization of gravity necessary to understand Planck-scale physics?

Don't we just need a theory of gravity that doesn't have singularities at that level?

I suppose that implies that there is some sort of short-distance cutoff where the gravity equations stop acting like a 1/r^2 force. But is quantization the only method that will generate this behavior?
 
inflector said:
Why is quantization of gravity necessary to understand Planck-scale physics?

Don't we just need a theory of gravity that doesn't have singularities at that level?

I suppose that implies that there is some sort of short-distance cutoff where the gravity equations stop acting like a 1/r^2 force. But is quantization the only method that will generate this behavior?

It is so described in the first paragraph: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planck_scale

And a theory without singularities at Planck Scale is ultimately a theory of quantum gravity.
 
Thread 'LQG Legend Writes Paper Claiming GR Explains Dark Matter Phenomena'
A new group of investigators are attempting something similar to Deur's work, which seeks to explain dark matter phenomena with general relativity corrections to Newtonian gravity is systems like galaxies. Deur's most similar publication to this one along these lines was: One thing that makes this new paper notable is that the corresponding author is Giorgio Immirzi, the person after whom the somewhat mysterious Immirzi parameter of Loop Quantum Gravity is named. I will be reviewing the...
I seem to notice a buildup of papers like this: Detecting single gravitons with quantum sensing. (OK, old one.) Toward graviton detection via photon-graviton quantum state conversion Is this akin to “we’re soon gonna put string theory to the test”, or are these legit? Mind, I’m not expecting anyone to read the papers and explain them to me, but if one of you educated people already have an opinion I’d like to hear it. If not please ignore me. EDIT: I strongly suspect it’s bunk but...
https://arxiv.org/pdf/2503.09804 From the abstract: ... Our derivation uses both EE and the Newtonian approximation of EE in Part I, to describe semi-classically in Part II the advection of DM, created at the level of the universe, into galaxies and clusters thereof. This advection happens proportional with their own classically generated gravitational field g, due to self-interaction of the gravitational field. It is based on the universal formula ρD =λgg′2 for the densityρ D of DM...
Back
Top