Indeterminism in Classical Physics

AI Thread Summary
Roger Penrose's discussion in "The Emperor's New Mind" highlights the concept of determinism in Newtonian mechanics, particularly through the example of elastic collisions between solid balls. He argues that while two-ball collisions are deterministic, introducing a third ball creates scenarios where the outcome can vary significantly based on the order of collisions, leading to indeterminism. This occurs because the initial conditions can result in discontinuous changes in motion, making it impossible to predict outcomes accurately. The definition of determinism as a property of mathematical models is crucial, as it emphasizes that the state of a system at one time should ideally determine all future states. Ultimately, the complexities of multi-body collisions challenge the notion of complete determinism in classical mechanics.
klen
Messages
40
Reaction score
1
I was reading the Roger Penrose book Emperor's New Mind and he was explaining the determinism in Newtonian mechanics.
He says that if we consider two solid balls colliding (assuming elastic collision) then outcome depends continuously on initial state of the balls.
But if we consider triple or higher order collisions say three balls A,B,C come together at once it makes a difference if we consider A and B come together and then C to collide with B immediately afterwards or if we consider A and C to come together and then B to collide with A immediately afterwards.
From this he concludes that there is indeterminism in exact triple collisions and the output depends discontinuously on the input state.
I don't quite understand above conclusions. Could anyone please explain it to me??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First important thing is to define determinism. The word is used in various shades of meaning.

The definition I like is this: determinism is a property of mathematical model. The model is deterministic if the state of the model system at one time is sufficient to determine its state at all past and future times.

The motions of perfect balls are rectilinear except when they collide; in collision, they change their velocity.

It is true that slight variation of the initial condition can lead to great variation of the resulting motion. In case of perfectly solid spheres, the collisions are instantaneous. This allows for the possibility that the resulting motions after the collisions are discontinuous functions of the initial conditions.

The initial condition for which there is discontinuity in the motion is special, because due to the discontinuity, the motion for this condition is not determined. It can be anyone from those defining the discontinuity. Hence the model is not entirely deterministic.
 
Jano thanks for your reply it was helpful
 
Well, talking of ideal bodies in Newtonian mechanics, it's not determined even the problem of finding the constraint reactions of a four-feet rigid body resting on the pavement.
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top