Index of Refraction, Snell's Law, and Brewster's Angle

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a lab experiment involving the application of Snell's Law to determine the index of refraction of a lab bench material. The original poster describes measurements taken from their eye level to the center of a bright spot seen through a polarizer, along with the use of the refractive index of air.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to calculate the Brewster angle and the index of refraction using their measurements, but expresses confusion about the results, particularly regarding the index of refraction being greater than one. Some participants question the validity of an index of refraction less than one and discuss the implications of such a value.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing insights and clarifications regarding the concepts of refraction and Brewster's angle. There is no explicit consensus, but some guidance has been offered regarding the interpretation of the measurements and the equations involved.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the complexities of the experiment's setup and the definitions of the angles involved, particularly in the context of polarization and the assumptions made about the refractive indices.

alibert0914
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



This was for a lab experiment, and I'm still not sure how this all fits together. We were supposed to use snell's law to find the index of refraction for the lab bench. We measured from the top of the bench to our eye level, and to the center of the bright spot seen through a polaraizer. Height was 0.741 m, and distance was 0.605 m. We used the ref. index of air for n1.


Homework Equations



tan (theta): height/distance

n1sin(theta1) = n2sin(theta2)

thetaB = arctan n2/n1


The Attempt at a Solution



We calculated an angle to be 50.9 degrees. We assumed this to be thetaB, and plugged it in. However, since we were using n1=1 for air, it just seems like a lot of back and forth, and we basically get arctan (thetaB) = n2= 1.23. Most everyone else in the lab seems to have gotten n2 to be less than one. If someone could give us a nudge in the right direction that would be very helpful. Thanks a lot!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
An index of refraction less than 1.0 is rather unlikely I would think.
 
Welcome to PF alibert0914!

I don't think you really need the equation for Snell's law, since refraction is not happening here (EDIT: for the polarization of interest, anyway). If memory serves, the Brewster angle is the angle at which light (with a specific polarization) that is incident upon an interface between two media will be totally reflected (i.e. none of it will be transmitted from the first medium to the second). Since the angle of incidence equals the angle of reflection, the angle you measured was equal to the angle of incidence. So you have

tan(θB) = n2/n1 = n2

= height/distance = 1.22

As for your classmates -- a refractive index less than 1? I think not. This would mean that the speed of light in the lab bench material would be faster than c, the speed of light in a vacuum.
 
Thanks so much everyone! My partner and I just wanted to double check everything before we turn our report in. :biggrin:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
7K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
6K
Replies
4
Views
2K