Induced charg by chagr distribution

AI Thread Summary
Calculating the induced charge on a conductor from a charge distribution, such as a conducting disc, can be approached using the method of image charges, which allows for the superposition of individual charge effects. While this method is effective for point charges, it can be extended to charge distributions by integrating over the distribution to determine the total field. The problem becomes more complex when the charge distribution on the conductor changes due to interactions with the induced charges, necessitating a different approach. By treating the conductors as equipotential surfaces and applying Laplace's equation with appropriate boundary conditions, one can find the new charge distributions. Analytical solutions may be available for some cases, but numerical methods may be required for more complex scenarios.
gabrielbhl
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
Hi everybody
It's easy (and well known) to calculate the charge distribution of a condutor in the presence of a point chage. BUT if we change this point charge and put an charge distribution... like a condutor disc, how can I calculate the induced chage of the other conductor??

THANKS
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Even using the method of image charges is is too dificul to calculate... I have no idea
 
If you have a geometry where you can use image charges then nothing is changed by replacing the point charge with a distribution of charges. Electromagnetics follows linear superposition and since this is a static problem your total solution will be the solution for each individual charge in your distribution. So you can just find the image of the charge distribution and calculate the field from the image.

Of course using images is only limited to a small subset of problems, but the point still stands. If you can solve for a single charge then you can just extend the method for a distribution of charges. The primary difference will lie in that you will have to integrate over the charge distribution (much like you would sum up over a finite set of charges) to get the total field.

This is assuming that your charge distribution will not change in the presence of an applied field. But if you were to charge a conducting disc then the charge distribution on your disc will change due to the interaction of the original charge distribution with the induced charge distribution on your conductor. In this case it is a much more difficult problem. However, you can solve this problem more easily by first noting that a conductor is an equipotential surface. So instead of trying to work from the standpoint of:
I have charge distribution A on a conducting object. I bring in conducting object B. What is the new charge distributions on A and B?

You work from the viewpoint of:
I have an object A with a potential of X. I bring in B. What is the charge distribution on A and B where A has a potential of X and B has a potential of 0 when they are infinitely separated?

You can represent this problem as a differential equation, Laplace's equation, and using the appropriate boundary conditions you can then solve for the potential on the surfaces of the objects. There are some problems where you can solve this analytically (method of images is just an example of this) but sometimes you need to use numerical techniques like method of moments or relaxation methods.
 
man.. thanks a lot, really, i was freaking out here... I needed to hear (read) it from someone. Thanks!
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top