What Direction Does the Induced Current Flow When a Magnetic Field Decreases?

AI Thread Summary
When a magnetic field directed out of the page decreases, the induced current in a wire loop flows counterclockwise, according to Lenz's law, which states that induced currents oppose changes in magnetic flux. The right-hand grip rule supports this direction, as the induced current generates a magnetic field that counters the decrease. There is confusion about why the focus is on the change inside the loop rather than outside, which is clarified by Faraday's law of induction, emphasizing the importance of the enclosed magnetic flux. The discussion highlights a lack of understanding regarding the physical significance of these laws in electromagnetism. Overall, the induced current's direction is crucial for understanding electromagnetic induction principles.
llama0lover
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
A magnetic field B, that is decreasing with time is directed out of the page and passes through a loop of wire in the plane of the page, as in my drawing (ignore that the dots are not evenly spaced, you can only do so much in paint) Which of the following is true of the induced current in the wire loop?

A) it is directed into the page
B)it is directed out of the page
C) It is counterclockwise in direction
D) it is clockwise in direction
E) It is zero in magnitude
 

Attachments

  • Untitled.png
    Untitled.png
    2.7 KB · Views: 625
Physics news on Phys.org
Okay, we got this problem now- thanks anyway, physics board!
 
Hey I'm having trouble with this problem too. What was the answer and how did you obtain it? Is it counterclockwise?
 
According to the Lenz's law, an induced current flows in a direction that opposes the change causing it.

I think in this way:
As the out-of-paper magnetic field is decreasing in magnitude, the induced current should produce a magnetic field which minimizes the effect of such a change.
Therefore, a out-of-paper magnetic field should be generated.
Thus, the induced current should flow in a counterclockwise direction by the right-hand grip rule.
 
kiwakwok said:
According to the Lenz's law, an induced current flows in a direction that opposes the change causing it.

I think in this way:
As the out-of-paper magnetic field is decreasing in magnitude, the induced current should produce a magnetic field which minimizes the effect of such a change.
Therefore, a out-of-paper magnetic field should be generated.
Thus, the induced current should flow in a counterclockwise direction by the right-hand grip rule.

Thanks! That's how I think of it too but I don't understand why it must minimize the change inside the loop and not outside the loop. If you grip it so that your fingers point out of the paper outside the loop, the current flows clockwise.
 
The reason why we just consider the change in magnetic flux enclosed by the circuit is given in Faraday's law of induction.

Frankly speaking, I do not know why the law is established in this way due to my poor knowledge in Physics. (Sorry :frown:)
I also want to know whether it has any physical meaning or importance.
 
This is from Griffiths' Electrodynamics, 3rd edition, page 352. I am trying to calculate the divergence of the Maxwell stress tensor. The tensor is given as ##T_{ij} =\epsilon_0 (E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} E^2)+\frac 1 {\mu_0}(B_iB_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} B^2)##. To make things easier, I just want to focus on the part with the electrical field, i.e. I want to find the divergence of ##E_{ij}=E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij}E^2##. In matrix form, this tensor should look like this...
Thread 'Applying the Gauss (1835) formula for force between 2 parallel DC currents'
Please can anyone either:- (1) point me to a derivation of the perpendicular force (Fy) between two very long parallel wires carrying steady currents utilising the formula of Gauss for the force F along the line r between 2 charges? Or alternatively (2) point out where I have gone wrong in my method? I am having problems with calculating the direction and magnitude of the force as expected from modern (Biot-Savart-Maxwell-Lorentz) formula. Here is my method and results so far:- This...
Back
Top