Induced current on a metallic ring

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the calculation of induced current in a metallic ring subjected to an oscillating magnetic field. The induced current is derived using the formula I_induced(t) = - (π R^2 Bo ω /L)/sqrt((ωL)^2 + R^2) * cos (ω t + δ), where δ is the phase shift related to resistance and inductance. There is a debate about whether the magnetic field generated by the induced current should be considered, as it contributes to the total magnetic flux through the ring. However, it is noted that the self-inductance already accounts for the voltage induced by the current in the ring. The conversation highlights the complexities of electromagnetic interactions in such systems.
DonJuvenal
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I've just got confused about how the induced current in a metallic ring is calculated.

Consider a metallic ring (radius a, resistance R and inductance L) immersed in a oscillating magnetic field, which is oriented orthogonally to the plane of the ring.

The variation in flux of magnetic field induces a FEM. Modelling the ring as a resistor in series with an inductance, give us the well know result about the induced current and its phase relative to the external field. More concretely:

if B(t) = Bo Cos(ω t) then
I_induced(t) = - (π R^2 Bo ω /L)/sqrt((ωL)^2 + R^2) * cos (ω t + δ)

with δ= atan (R/(wL)).

Thus, the external field sets the induced current.

Why the magnetic field due to the induced current is not taken into account? The total field is the sum of the external uniform field plus the inhomogeneous induced one, therefore the magnetic flux across the ring is not only given by the external field. Should the induced field be taken into account in a self-consistent procedure?

I appreciate in advance your replies.

Best wishes,


Juvenal.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
L deals with the emf due to the changing field due to the changing induced current, does it not?
 
You're absolutely right, the current in the ring creates a flux and its variation creates a voltage, including if the current results from an external field.

You have already taken this effect in account when using the self-inductance to compute the current. The self-inductance tells how much voltage is induced in the ring by its own current.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top