What Is the Induced Metric on a Spacelike Hypersurface t=const?

Xander314
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Let g_{\mu\nu} be a static metric, \partial_t g_{\mu\nu}=0 where t is coordinate time. Show that the metric induced on a spacelike hypersurface t=\textrm{const} is given by
<br /> \gamma_{ij} = g_{ij} - \frac{g_{ti} g_{tj}}{g_{tt}} .<br />

Homework Equations


Let y^i be the coordinates on the hypersurface and x^\mu the spacetime coordinates. The induced metric on a generic hypersurface defined by the embedding x^\mu = X^\mu(y^i) is given by
<br /> \gamma_{ij} = g_{\mu\nu} \partial_i X^\mu \partial_j X^\nu .<br />

The Attempt at a Solution


I really don't see how this can work. Since it is a hypersurface of constant coordinate time, the embedding is given by X^\mu = (t_0, X^i) so that \partial_i X^\mu = (0,\partial_i X^j). Then it immediately follows that
<br /> \gamma_{ij} = g_{kl} \partial_i X^k \partial_j X^l .<br />
There are no g_{ti} cross terms in my answer, nor is it clear to me that \partial_i X^k=\delta_i{}^k. What am I doing wrong?
 
Xander314 said:
What am I doing wrong?

The definition of the induced metric is ##\gamma_{ab} = g_{\mu\nu}\frac{\partial x^{\mu}}{\partial Y^a}\frac{\partial x^{\nu}}{\partial Y^b}## where ##x^{\mu}## are coordinates on space-time and ##Y^a## are coordinates on the hypersurface.
The embedding is ##Y^a = Y^a(x^{\mu})##. So you are doing the differentiation incorrectly.

Here is a very simple example to get you started. Let's compute the induced metric on a 2-sphere in ##\mathbb{R}^3##. The coordinates on the 2-sphere are ##(\theta,\phi)## and the embedding map is ##x = R\sin\theta\cos\phi, y = R\sin\theta\sin\phi, z = R\cos\theta##. Hence \gamma_{\theta\theta} = g_{xx}\frac{\partial x}{\partial \theta}\frac{\partial x}{\partial \theta} + g_{yy}\frac{\partial y}{\partial \theta}\frac{\partial y}{\partial \theta} + g_{zz}\frac{\partial z}{\partial \theta}\frac{\partial z}{\partial \theta} = R^2 \cos^2\theta \cos^2\phi + R^2 \cos^2\theta \sin^2\phi + R^2 \cos^2\theta = R^2 and \gamma_{\phi\phi} = g_{xx}\frac{\partial x}{\partial \phi}\frac{\partial x}{\partial \phi} + g_{yy}\frac{\partial y}{\partial \phi}\frac{\partial y}{\partial \phi} + g_{zz}\frac{\partial z}{\partial \phi}\frac{\partial z}{\partial \phi} = R^2 \sin^2\theta \sin^2 \phi + R^2 \sin^2\theta\cos^2 \phi = R^2 \sin^2 \theta A similar calculation shows that ##\gamma_{\theta\phi} = 0##.
 
  • Like
Likes micromass
Hello everyone, I’m considering a point charge q that oscillates harmonically about the origin along the z-axis, e.g. $$z_{q}(t)= A\sin(wt)$$ In a strongly simplified / quasi-instantaneous approximation I ignore retardation and take the electric field at the position ##r=(x,y,z)## simply to be the “Coulomb field at the charge’s instantaneous position”: $$E(r,t)=\frac{q}{4\pi\varepsilon_{0}}\frac{r-r_{q}(t)}{||r-r_{q}(t)||^{3}}$$ with $$r_{q}(t)=(0,0,z_{q}(t))$$ (I’m aware this isn’t...
Hi, I had an exam and I completely messed up a problem. Especially one part which was necessary for the rest of the problem. Basically, I have a wormhole metric: $$(ds)^2 = -(dt)^2 + (dr)^2 + (r^2 + b^2)( (d\theta)^2 + sin^2 \theta (d\phi)^2 )$$ Where ##b=1## with an orbit only in the equatorial plane. We also know from the question that the orbit must satisfy this relationship: $$\varepsilon = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 + V_{eff}(r)$$ Ultimately, I was tasked to find the initial...
Back
Top