I Induction heating vs Current heaing

AI Thread Summary
Induction heating and current heating in a metal rod can generate heat differently, even when using the same amperage and frequency. In both cases, the skin depth determines how deeply the heat penetrates the material, but the mechanisms of heating differ. Direct current heating relies on electron motion interacting with the atomic structure, while induction heating generates eddy currents due to a magnetic field, which also leads to secondary interactions. The discussion raises questions about whether the skin depths are the same in both scenarios and how these factors influence overall heat generation. Understanding these differences is crucial for optimizing heating methods in various applications.
artis
Messages
1,479
Reaction score
976
I've been thinking and can't come up with a satisfying answer. Would there be a difference in the amount of heat generated in a given time in a metal rod if it was heated by
a) induction
b) current passing through the same length of rod

Given that the current is the same amperage and frequency in both cases, also not taking into account the losses in current in the induction case.

So let's say you use 20kHz at 10 amps in one situation you simply pass that current down a metal rod , the current runs on the outer surface of the rod at the skin depth of the frequency given.
In the other case the same current runs through a coil creating a B field which then penetrates the metal rod to a skin depth.

So would there be any differences?
Are the skin depths the same both for the current through rod as well as B field penetrating rod case?

What about the mechanism for heating, in the current case it is the motion of electrons interacting with the atomic structure but in the induction case it also seems the same only due to eddy currents. The heat passed deeper than skin depth is then simply due to secondary interactions caused by the skin depth movement of electrons?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
a) induction is interpreted in effect as generated induction current. Since a) and b) are both currents, I think their effects are compared with how much current they experience.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top