Inductors' voltage direction and Lenz Law

AI Thread Summary
In a de-energizing RL circuit, the inductor generates an opposing voltage to maintain current flow when the voltage source is removed. Initially, the inductor develops a magnetic field as the current increases, but once the source is disconnected, the current begins to decrease. Lenz's law explains that the inductor will oppose this decrease by using its magnetic field to sustain current flow for a short time. As the current decreases, the voltage across the inductor changes from positive to negative, reflecting the change in current direction. This behavior highlights the inductor's resistance to rapid changes in current while allowing voltage to change freely.
Nikitin
Messages
734
Reaction score
27
In the attached figure, a de-energizing RL circuit is drawn (left switch is opened while right switch is closed). In the drawing the voltage induced in the inductor is put to be negative so that the math works out.

However, that would be against Lenz's law, wouldn't it? The inductor should be trying its best to increase the current, not work against it. According to my intuition, the inductor should be "lifting the current" to a higher potential to compensate for the frictional loss in the resistance element.

Hmm, but then again, the electrical field is pointing downwards in the inductor which does accelerate the current.. I'm kinda confused here.
 

Attachments

  • 10538414_10203854928870295_7786317160868860561_n.jpg
    10538414_10203854928870295_7786317160868860561_n.jpg
    35.4 KB · Views: 591
Physics news on Phys.org
Maybe it would help to first think of how you got to t=0; in other words, a lot happened before the switches changed.

Inductors react to changing current and don't quite like rapid current changes, so...during the time before t=0, the current in the circuit worked its way from zero at t=-N sec to some positive value at t=0 sec and all along the inductor developed an opposing voltage to the source... i and v as shown are both positive since v = Ldi/dt.

Think of this changing current charging the inductor with magnetic field.

At t=0, without the voltage source, the current no longer has a pushing force behind it and can no longer hold the inductor magnetic field...so, now the current without a voltage source behind it wants to start slowing down, but the inductor does not like this and starts using its own magnetic field to try its best to keep the current flowing...it won't succed for long, but the current flows for a little longer starting at t=0 from the same value it had before and working its way to zero.

During this t>0, because the current is now decreasing instead of increasing, the sign of the derivative changes sign and so, the voltage as defined goes instantaneously from positive to negative...and this is fine, because inductors mind currents changing, but don't mind voltages changing (capacitors, on the flip side, don't let voltage change suddenly, but the current can change just fine).

Hope this helps.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top